SKU: 17653200932
karl lagerfeld pink dress

karl lagerfeld pink dress Spring 2005 Chanel by Karl Lagerfeld Runway Softest Pale Pink Floating – Shrimpton Couture

Sale price$25.86 Regular price$28.73
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $7.18 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Oct 5 - Oct 10

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

karl lagerfeld pink dress Spring 2005 Chanel by Karl Lagerfeld Runway Softest Pale Pink Floating – Shrimpton CoutureThis is a very well documented dress and it is gorgeous. It is the second one I have had in the shop and I love it even more this time around. The twin of the dress walk the runway on Liya Kebede and then Karl photoed it himself on Supermodel Daria Werbowy for the Chanel campaign that year. That photo also appears in the book 'Chanel; The Karl Lagerfeld Campaigns' on page 357. Tinsley Mortimer also wore on that year. For this show Karl had the runway

This is a very well documented dress and it is gorgeous. It is the second one I have had in the shop and I love it even more this time around. The twin of the dress walk the runway on Liya Kebede and then Karl photoed it himself on Supermodel Daria Werbowy for the Chanel campaign that year. That photo also appears in the book  'Chanel; The Karl Lagerfeld Campaigns' on page 357. Tinsley Mortimer also wore on that year.  For this show Karl had the runway finished with a red carpet. This was in tribute to the  Baz Luhrmann Chanel No5 directed advertisement that yer that had starred Nicole Kidman. All the super models of the day paraded down the catwalk 'Fame' blasting through the room. At the end of the carpet the girls posed for a pack pf photographers with flashbulbs popping off and adding to the excitement of the show. The runway reference photos and tiny clip of video we found give you an idea of the incredible movement of the dress.

The first thing that you will notice when you see this dress in person is how incredibly light it is. It is a dream to wear. It is an absolutely stunning dress and no matter how good it looks in these photos it is even better in real life. Tiny little lace straps curve over each shoulder and then a floating panel of the chiffon is attached around its outer edge to drape over your arm. It curves up a the front and then goes all the around the back for a bit of a cape feel. The front plunges and crosses over itself to the first lace trimmed angled seam. The lace trimmed seams continue down over the dress crossing over the body from just under the bust all the way down to past the hips. Starting at about the waist area on each side are floating chiffon panels that drape down to the floor. Another panel sits across the centre of the back and then more panels of chiffon are attached under that all the way around to create the lower skirts. The front is cut to curve up and finished with a deep ruffle so you see a flash of leg when you move or sit and then the back trails out behind you. It is so gorgeous to see. As you walk you get this sweeping feel created by all this individual panels as they catch the air and float around you. The colour is a soft pale and pretty pink and the silk has a subtle touch of texture to it. It is absolutely beautiful. This might even make an amazing wedding dress for the bride looking for a non-traditional choice or as an alternative dress in a more extended wedding celebration. And of course it could also be worn to any event. Excellent condition with one minor note below

The dress is lined with a second doubled layer of a matching pink silk chiffon. The inner layer closes with a zipper and then the exterior layer of the dress buttons in place over that with a series of enamel double C logo buttons. Some of the buttons have slight patina to them and one button is not a Chanel button but it is hidden under the very top ruffle so you would never see it. The bias cut should allow it to work on a range of sizes. It will just drape more on a smaller frame. Tagged a vintage Chanel 44. The close up of the label is the best photo for colour

Bust: 19-20" flat across from side seam to side seam
Inner waist: 19" flat across from side seam to side seam
Hips: to 22" flat across from side seam to side seam
Length: 42" from top of shoulder to shortest part of the front hem and 68" to the longest point at the back

Modern Sizing Equivalent: MED-LRG

Item# DD4548

Reference Photos/Video: (1-6) Spring 2005 Chanel Runway, Look 55. Model Liya Kebede.  /  (7) Daria Werbowy by Karl Lagerfeld from 'Chanel; The Karl Lagerfeld Campaigns' .  /  (8) Tinsley Mortimer at the The Metropolitan Museum of Art, Young Friends Benefit Dance, "The Grand Tour", November 2005. 

All items are thoroughly checked over before shipping. Unless noted everything in our shop has been professionally cleaned. All sales are final. Overseas clients will be emailed to obtain agreement to our final sales policy before the order is shipped as per our return policy.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 17653200932

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell karl lagerfeld pink dress

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 29 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
B
Verified Purchase
breezy
Lexington, US
★★★★★ 5
Good Fit
Bought for a wedding for my husband he looked good an felt comfortable.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 9, 2025
G
Verified Purchase
Gary Darling
Natrona Heights, US
★★★★★ 3
Didn’t last as long as I had hoped
Pants were okay for a returned item, but certainly not the best. They lasted a few months before defects got worse. Probably will convince me to just buy new all the time.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 6, 2025
R
Verified Purchase
Ryan
Lake Worth, US
★★★★★ 5
Best Pants I've Ever Owned!!
Size: 44W x 34L Big Tall, Color: Navy Blazer
There is not a bad thing to say about these pants. They look great (I get compliments all the time, as well as people asking for information on them), feel great, are super comfortable, and are actually quite durable. I own these in blue and gray and they are by far my favorite pants to where to work. They work for both business-casual, as well as business-formal dress-codes. Buy these pants!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 27, 2023
L
Verified Purchase
lebowitzit
Lake Worth, US
★★★★★ 5
Fits Fine, Looks Great, Sizing Makes No Sense
Size: 16.5" Neck 32"-33" Sleeve, Color: White, Size: 16.5" Neck 32"-33" Sleeve, Color: White
I hate shopping for dress shirts. For me, at least, it is a thoroughly frustrating experience, mostly because there's no consistency at all to the sizing. Actually, that's not quite true: dress shirts consistently DON'T FIT ME PROPERLY, which means I have to look at a lot of shirts and scrutinize size charts - which are usually incomplete, when they're provided at all - before finally finding The One. And sometimes, like this time, I don't manage to find The One. But this shirt comes close, as I will explain. The problem stems from my physique, which I never thought of as unique, but here it is: I'm short (just under 5'4", with a 40-41" chest, a little extra weight (so my middle is about the same), a 36" waist, 33" arms when measured the traditional way (more on that later) and a 16" neck. That last measurement is the single biggest problem: most shirt manufacturers apparently think that if you have a 16' neck, you are shaped like Omar the Tentmaker. Van Heusen is no exception. Note that this shirt is listed as "fitted". Now, that's a completely amorphous descriptor, which, I suppose, is true for most shirt fit descriptors these days. But if you look at Van Heusen's "regular" fit shirts, you'll find that they think if you have a 16" neck, you must have a nearly 50" chest and your waist is over 45". That's not regular, that's freakin' portly! I was afraid to even look at any of their Big & Tall men's dress shirts -- if their idea of regular fit was this skewed, then I didn't want to know what they think Big & Tall is. Thankfully, this is a "fitted" shirt, so Van Heusen thoughtfully provides the 16" neck version with a 42-44" chest and 36-38" waist. That's the size I bought, and it actually fits me pretty well. Still a little loose for a "fitted" shirt, but it doesn't look baggy, and that's what I was after. But a little more realism in the size descriptions would be greatly appreciated. Regarding the sleeve length, I really don't know what's up. I've seen charts that tell you how to measure it, but no matter how I measure it, I never manage to come up with any of the sleeve lengths provided on size charts. I have noticed that there appear to be two ways of measuring it, though. One way, which I call the traditional way because it seems to have been around longer, starts the measurement somewhere between the edge of the shoulder and the neck. At least, I think that's where it starts -- approximately. As I said before, I never manage to come up with the same number. But by this measurement, my correct sleeve length is 32-33", and the average guy's is probably 34-35". In the last year or so, when I shopped for shirts, I found some size charts using a different method, because the numbers were a lot lower, anywhere from 22" to 28". I have no idea where they came up with that measurement, nor do I know what mine is by this method, because the shirts I ended up buying so far have all used what I referred to as the traditional method. Anyway, the shirt looked quite nice on me, right out of the package, and continues to look quite nice on me after a couple of washings. The photo I attached is what the shirt looked like after being washed twice. I wash my shirts on my machine's Delicate cycle and hang them to dry. When cared for this way, the shirt does a pretty good job of living up to the listing's claim of wrinkle resistance. It doesn't come out perfectly smooth and crisp, but it looks good enough that I don't feel inclined to iron it. I decided on a poplin shirt because I was shopping for a summer-weight shirt that would breathe well. But poplin shirts proved nonexistent in my local stores, and not all that plentiful online. Poplin shirts listed online with full size charts so I could tell whether or not they might fit me were nearly as hard to find as igloos in the Mojave Desert, and poplin shirts whose size charts indicated that they were available with dimensions that would actually fit me were somewhere between that and hen's teeth. Needless to say, I was thrilled when I found this one. But the composition of poplin appears to be open to some interpretation. I own a few poplin business shirts (which I wear without suits and ties), and upon receiving my new Van Heusen shirts, it seemed to me that my poplin business shirts were lighter and breathed better. But then it occurred to me that shirt manufacturers often treat their material with coatings that improve the luster and crispness of their shirts for display purposes, and such coatings might be why my new shirts felt stiff, heavy and not particularly airy. Not wanting to give up and send the new shirts back, I decided to take a risk and launder them to see if that improved the feel. Thankfully, it did. After two washings, my new shirts are less shiny than delivered (which I'm fine with), a lot less stiff and breathe reasonably well. So... these shirts fit well, look good and feel good. Check, check and check. That means I'm fully satisfied with them, right? Wrong -- I am NOT fully satisfied with them. It's summertime. Summertime where I live is hot and often quite humid. I wanted shirts appropriate for that weather. To me, that has always meant lightweight broadcloth short-sleeve shirts. But it seems that today's Fashion Police have decreed that there is no longer such a thing as a short-sleeve dress shirt. They have decreed that today's well-dressed men must wear heavy cotton, long-sleeve shirts year-round. Well, excuse me for living, but some of us perspire when dressed that way in summer heat. Poplin shirts were presented to me as the compromise between acceptable modern fashion and comfort. Linen shirts were also recommended, but I couldn't find a single linen shirt what didn't have a crinkly, casual finish, much less one that was intended to be worn with a tie. With extreme effort, I found a poplin shirt that fits well, and I bought two of them, but while they are more comfortable in the sticky summer heat than heavy cotton, they are NOT as comfortable as my old short-sleeve dress shirts. I want new short-sleeve dress shirts, dagnab it! But until I successfully identify and locate all those insane Fashion Police, blow up their air conditioners and confine them to a Chicago Summer Simulator (otherwise known as a sauna) for three days in their heavy cotton shirts so that they will once again bless the manufacture of short-sleeve dress shirts, I guess these Van Heusen fitted long-sleeve poplin shirts will have to do.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 30, 2024
T
Verified Purchase
Tom McCartney
Chelsea, US
★★★★★ 5
Great quality and true to size labeled.
Size: 16.5" Neck 32"-33" Sleeve, Color: White
Top quality shirt at a great price. Sleeve and neck size true to as labeled. Material lightweight, which is perfect. I could not be happier with this purchase.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 22, 2026

recommand products