SKU: 14331129812
where can i find san pedro cactus

where can i find san pedro cactus Buy San Pedro Cactus Phoenix, AZ | Echinopsis pachanoi

Sale price$22.94 Regular price$25.49
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $6.37 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 28 - Sep 2

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

where can i find san pedro cactus Buy San Pedro Cactus Phoenix, AZ | Echinopsis pachanoiA Towering Columnar Cactus for Phoenix Desert Gardens San Pedro The San Pedro Cactus (Echinopsis pachanoi) is one of the fastest growing columnar cacti available for Phoenix landscapes. Native to the Andes Mountains, this striking blue green cactus grows tall, ribbed columns that branch with age into dramatic multi stemmed specimens. San Pedro can reach 1020 feet tall in the Phoenix Valley, adding bold vertical structure to xeriscape gardens,

A Towering Columnar Cactus for Phoenix Desert Gardens — San Pedro

The San Pedro Cactus (Echinopsis pachanoi) is one of the fastest-growing columnar cacti available for Phoenix landscapes. Native to the Andes Mountains, this striking blue-green cactus grows tall, ribbed columns that branch with age into dramatic multi-stemmed specimens. San Pedro can reach 10–20 feet tall in the Phoenix Valley, adding bold vertical structure to xeriscape gardens, courtyard plantings, and modern desert designs. It produces spectacular large white flowers that bloom at night during summer — a rare treat for any garden. Whether you’re creating a sculptural cactus garden in Scottsdale, anchoring a Chandler desert border, or adding architectural drama to a Mesa backyard — San Pedro delivers fast growth and jaw-dropping form.

San Pedro Cactus Plant Details

Attribute Detail
Scientific Name Echinopsis pachanoi (syn. Trichocereus pachanoi)
Common Names San Pedro Cactus, Saint Peter Cactus
Mature Height 10–20 feet
Mature Width 4–6 feet (multi-branched clump)
Growth Rate Fast for a cactus — 1–2 feet per year in Phoenix
Sun Full sun to light shade. Handles reflected heat well.
Water Low once established. Drought-tolerant but appreciates occasional deep watering.
USDA Zones 9–11 (Phoenix is Zone 9b–10a)
Soil Well-draining required. Thrives in sandy, rocky Arizona soils and handles caliche with drainage.
Foliage Evergreen — blue-green ribbed columns year-round
Bloom Large white nocturnal flowers in summer — fragrant and spectacular

San Pedro Cactus Uses in Phoenix Landscapes

Sculptural Focal Point & Cactus Gardens

San Pedro’s tall, ribbed columns create dramatic vertical architecture in any desert garden. Plant a single specimen as a living sculpture in a Scottsdale courtyard, or group 3–5 for a columnar cactus grove effect. Pair with Golden Barrel, Totem Pole Cactus, and Mexican Fencepost for an all-columnar desert statement garden.

Modern Desert Borders & Property Screens

Because San Pedro branches and fills in with age, it makes an effective living screen or border plant. Space 3–4 feet apart along a Chandler property line or Gilbert fence to create a striking green wall. The columns grow fast enough to provide meaningful screening within 3–5 years.

Pool-Friendly & Low-Litter Plantings

San Pedro is an excellent pool-adjacent plant — it produces virtually no leaf litter, requires minimal trimming, and its smooth columns and minimal spines make it safer than many cacti. Plant along Tempe and Mesa pool perimeters for a clean, architectural look with zero maintenance debris.

Best Time to Plant San Pedro Cactus in Phoenix

Spring (March–May) is the ideal planting window. Warm soil and rising temperatures promote fast root establishment and active growth. Fall (October–November) is the second-best option. Avoid planting in winter — San Pedro is slightly frost-sensitive and roots best in warm soil.

How to Plant San Pedro Cactus

  1. Dig wide, not deep — excavate 2x the root ball width at the same depth. Cacti have shallow root systems.
  2. Ensure excellent drainage — break through any caliche layer. San Pedro will rot in standing water.
  3. Backfill with native soil — no amendments needed. Sandy, rocky Arizona soil is ideal.
  4. Spacing — 3–4 feet apart for a border or screen; 5+ feet for standalone specimens.
  5. Let the cut callus — if transplanting a cutting, let the cut end dry and callus for 1–2 weeks before planting.
  6. Gravel mulch — 2–3 inches of decomposed granite or gravel. Never use organic mulch that retains moisture.

Watering San Pedro Cactus in Phoenix

First Year Watering Schedule

  • Weeks 1–2: Every 5–7 days, light watering to settle soil
  • Months 1–2: Every 7–10 days
  • Months 3–6: Every 10–14 days
  • After Year 1: Every 2–3 weeks in summer; monthly or less in winter

Drip Irrigation

Place 1 emitter (1–2 GPH) 12–18 inches from the base. San Pedro appreciates more water than most columnar cacti, which helps it maintain its fast growth rate. However, always let the soil dry completely between waterings. Overwatering causes root rot.

How fast does San Pedro grow in Phoenix?
San Pedro is one of the fastest-growing columnar cacti, adding 1–2 feet per year in Phoenix with regular summer watering. A 5-gallon plant can reach 6–8 feet within 3–4 years.

Is San Pedro frost-hardy in Phoenix?
San Pedro handles most Phoenix winters well, tolerating temps down to about 25°F. During rare hard freezes, drape frost cloth over the plant. Established specimens are more cold-hardy than young ones.

Does San Pedro bloom?
Yes — mature San Pedro cacti produce large, spectacular white flowers that open at night during summer. The blooms are fragrant and typically last one night, attracting moths and bats. Plants usually begin blooming once they reach 4–6 feet tall.

How does San Pedro compare to Totem Pole Cactus?
Both are tall columnar cacti, but San Pedro has visible ribs and small spines, while Totem Pole (Pachycereus schottii ‘Monstrosus’) is smooth and spineless with a knobby texture. San Pedro grows faster and produces showy flowers. Both are excellent choices for Phoenix desert gardens.

You May Also Like

  • Totem Pole Cactus — a smooth, spineless columnar cactus with a unique sculptural form.
  • Mexican Fence Post — a tall, columnar cactus often used as a living fence in desert landscapes.
  • Golden Barrel Cactus — a round, golden-spined cactus that contrasts beautifully with tall columnar species.
  • Ocotillo — a spindly desert native with fiery red spring blooms, perfect for adding movement to cactus gardens.

How Many San Pedro Cactus Do I Need?

San Pedro works two ways: as a single sculptural specimen, or branched together into a fast-growing columnar screen. For a focal point, plant one and give it 5 to 6 feet of clear space so the multi-stemmed form can spread. For a living screen along a wall or property line, space the columns 3 to 4 feet apart:

Run length Plants at 3.5 ft spacing
10 ft 3 plants
20 ft 6 plants
30 ft 9 plants
40 ft 11 plants

For a grove effect, group 3 to 5 columns in odd numbers, each 3 to 4 feet apart, so the ribbed stems read as one bold cluster.

San Pedro Cactus Season-by-Season in Phoenix

  • Spring (Feb-Apr): Prime planting window. Warm soil drives fast root establishment and the first flush of new column growth.
  • Summer (May-Sep): Peak growth season, adding 1 to 2 feet with regular deep watering. Large fragrant white flowers open at night and draw moths and bats. Handles full reflected heat off walls and pavement.
  • Fall (Oct-Nov): Second-best planting window and continued growth before cooling. Taper watering as temperatures drop.
  • Winter (Dec-Jan): Evergreen blue-green structure holds all winter. Hardy to about 25°F: during a hard freeze, drape frost cloth over the columns, especially on young plants.

At a Glance

✔ Heat-Loving (Reflected-Heat Tolerant)   ✔ Drought-Tolerant   ✔ Pollinator-Friendly   ✔ Pool-Friendly (Low-Litter)   ✔ Evergreen   ✔ Low-Maintenance   ✔ Deer & Rabbit-Resistant   ✔ Cold-Hardy to 25°F

Plant It With

Is San Pedro Cactus Right for Your Yard?

San Pedro thrives in full sun to light shade with fast-draining soil, and it tolerates reflected heat off walls and pavement better than most columnar cacti. Give it room to branch and break through any caliche layer so water never pools at the roots. It is not a fit if your spot stays wet or shaded, or if you cannot cover it during a rare hard freeze while it is young.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 14331129812

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell where can i find san pedro cactus

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 26 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
C
Verified Purchase
Connie
Los Angeles, US
★★★★★ 5
Love it
Color: Brushed Nickel, Material Type: Stainless Steel
I love it. It holds the jumbo rolls and that makes it a perfect kitchennitem
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 28, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Mr. Douglas
Houston, US
★★★★★ 5
The Best Book on the Creation-Evolution Debate
Format: Paperback
“The book The Evolution of Adam is an accessible study of the hermeneutical issues involved in reading Genesis and Paul on Adam in view of evolution.” - Peter Enns In my opinion The Evolution of Adam by Peter Enns is the best book available on the evolution versus creation debate because it goes right to the heart of the matter. Christians grossly misunderstand the creation stories in Genesis because they read them from a modern point of view. The first part of the book deals with Adam in Genesis. The second part of the book deals with Paul's Adam in Romans. The book is short and very well written for the popular audience. PART 1 ADAM IN GENESIS Many stories in the Old Testament have parallels with other Ancient Near Eastern stories. The Adam story is no different as it has strong similarities to Atrahasis. If I may quote Enns, “Israel's creation story was written to say something about their place in the world and the God they worshiped. To think that the Israelites, alone among all other ancient peoples, were interested in (or capable of) giving some definitive, quasi-scientific, account of human origins is an absurd logic. And to read the story of Adam and Eve as if it were set up to so such a thing is simply wrongheaded. It strains credulity to think that, of all the ancient peoples with origins stories, Israel alone escaped this story-telling mentality and gave us something approximating 'history' or 'science' in the modern sense.” The Evolution of Adam shows conclusively that, “the Adam story in Genesis is part of Israel’s literature of national and religious self-definition, not the origin of humanity.” The Adam story is not concerned with human origins as most Christians assume. Adam is Israel. Israel’s history as a nation can be broken down as follows:   1. Israel is “created” by God at the exodus through a cosmic battle (gods are defeated and the Red Sea is “divided”);   2. The Israelites are given Canaan to inhabit, a lush land flowing with milk and honey;   3. They remain in the land as long as they obey the Mosaic law;   4. They persist in a pattern of disobedience and are exiled to Babylon. Israel’s history parallels Adam’s drama in Genesis:   1. Adam is created in Genesis 2 after the taming of chaos in Genesis 1;   2. Adam is placed in a lush garden;   3. Law (not to eat of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil) is given as a stipulation for remaining in the garden;   4. Adam and Eve disobey and are exiled. PART 2 PAUL'S ADAM Paul’s use of the Adam story, like Paul’s other uses of the Old Testament, is marked by creativity and the prior conviction that Jesus is God’s unexpected solution to a universal plight. Enns' summary of Paul's Adam in Romans 5:12-21 is as follows: 1. Adam is hardly mentioned in the Old Testament. 2. Some see Noah, Abraham, Moses, and David as “new Adams.” Paul represents Jesus as a new Adam. 3. The Fall of man is not taught in the Old Testament. 4. The Fall of man is not taught in the Garden scene. The imputation of Adam’s sin is not taught in the garden story. 5. The Adam/Jesus Parallel in Romans 5 is both clear and not so clear. What does Paul mean when he says that through Adam’s sin, “death came to all, because all sinned.” One might have expected Paul to say, “because Adam sinned” (death is Adam’s fault). 6. Paul’s Jesus/Adam parallel does not stem from a “plain reading” of Genesis. It is selective and theologically driven. The Book of Romans is not about personal salvation, but about the Jew/Gentile relationship. 7. Paul was an ancient man and he had an ancient view of human origins. 8. Paul used the Old Testament in creative ways that violate the grammatical-historical-contextual approach. So he could be doing the same with Adam. 9. Adam was used creatively in Second Temple Jewish literature (Paul’s contemporaries). CONCLUSION Evolution and creation are not in conflict because the early chapters of Genesis have nothing to do with HOW God created the world or the first humans. Therefore science can be studied freely for what it is and the Old Testament can be understood as ancient Israel's story. If I may quote Enns again, “The root of the conflict over evolution and creation for many Christians is not scientific or even theological, but group identity and fear of losing what it offers. The challenge of evolution is here to stay, and its effect on how Christians read Genesis and Paul must be addressed deliberately.” “Evangelicals tend to focus on how to protect the Bible against the attacks of evolution. The real challenge before them is to reorient their expectation of what the story of Adam and Eve is actually prepared to deliver.” If you are looking to solve the evolution-creation debate in your mind then the Evolution of Adam is the book to read. Evolution and creation are both true. God created through evolution. The Bible is not a modern science book.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 15, 2012
W
Verified Purchase
William M. Victor
Lake Worth, US
★★★★★ 4
Thoughtful book on the purpose of the Creation accounts
Format: Paperback
This book provides a very good introduction into how the Old Testament (Hebrew Bible) was most likely formed. It takes very seriously the environment that may have shaped the Pentateuch. It also provides a good primer into how Paul read the Hebrew Bible: through the lens of the death and resurrection of Jesus. If the reader of the Bible understands the purpose behind the creation narratives then there appears to be less conflict with scientific explanations for the origins of the universe and even humanity. I was expecting this book to do something that Enns never claims he was setting out to do, that is give an alternative understanding of the origins of sin and death while taking Paul's account in Romans 5 seriously. Enns claims that Paul interpreted the Adam story in a way that he interpreted other accounts of the Hebrew Bible, through a Christological lens but with little regard to historical context. To Enns, Paul was a man of his time and just because Paul, a man uninformed by scientific explanations of the universe, understood Adam as a historical person doesn't mean those of us who are informed need to see it the same way. Enns values Paul's Christocentric lens on the Hebrew Bible, but comes just short of calling Paul wrong on his understanding of the origin of sin and death. If you are working through the issue of integration/synthesizing scientific thoughts on the origins of the universe and humanity (as well as trying to come to grips with the purpose of the Creation accounts in Genesis) this book will serve you well. If you are expecting Enns to provide that integration/synthesis for you, you will be disappointed.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 3, 2012
M
Verified Purchase
Mark A. Chenoweth
Birmingham, US
★★★★★ 5
Enns' view of Adam will eventually dominate in the Evangelical academy
Format: Paperback
For years and years on end, I have been fascinated with trying to make Adam and Eve line up with evolution. I took a bunch of positions that I knew were ad-hoc but I didn't know what else to do at the time. One thing I couldn't figure out was why Genesis 1-3 seemed to be completely symbolic, yet Paul seemed to interpret it so literally. I read through Genesis 1-3 again and again and again. I picked up commentary after commentary. But the commentaries I read (other than Claus Westermann's-which is fantastic)seemed to make arbitrary jumps between interpreting the Adam story literally and symbolically. The attempts to literally interpret the story seemed to stem from a desire to stay faithful to Paul's reading of the story rather than from a desire to be faithful to the Genesis text. But shouldn't how Paul interprets the story be the final word on Adam for Christians? This is what The Evolution of Adam deals with. Paul's interpretation of the story in Romans and 1 Corinthians seemed to be a strange re-reading of the story...one that is overly literal. A talking snake? God walking in the garden? Every good Christian knows God doesn't have a body. So why in the world did Paul read this story so literally? It's this that Enns tries to answer. He shows us that Paul didn't intend to give us a historical critical exegesis of Genesis. Maybe Paul thought Adam was a literal person, maybe he didn't. This is beside the point. Enns shows that Paul was doing some pastoral reshaping of the Adam story along the lines of 2nd Temple Judaism to highlight the significance of Christ's death and resurrection. According to Enns' the "authorial intent" of Genesis 2 and 3 was of very little significance to Paul. Even if Paul knew (and there's good reason to believe he did) that Genesis doesn't indicate that Adam's sin has a universal effect on all humanity, he probably would have used the Adam story in the exact same way. Why? Because it was the best way to explain how Christ put Jews and Gentiles on an "equal footing." For Paul, Christ came first. Anything that could help explain the significance of Christ, even if that meant reshaping OT testament passages from their original "authorial intent," was fair game for Paul. And as Enns shows, it was also fair game for Paul's contemporaries. As Christians, we know we are sinners because we have a savior, not because Adam sinned. In the words of world-renowned Patristics professor and Eastern Orthodox scholar, John Behr, "We should not begin with a claim to know ourselves as sinful and then find a savior who corresponds to what we think our problems are...Christ provides the diagnosis of our condition and simultaneously provides the remedy." Enns' suggestions for the evolution debate are controversial among evangelicals, although they seem to be accepted by many Eastern Orthodox and Catholic academics today. Evangelicalism is a bit behind. Enns' book will provide for much discussion and will inflame reformed Evangenical fundamentalists like Albert Mohler. But his suggestions will ultimately be accepted by the majority of evangelical theologians in the next 100 or so years. I'm fairly sure of this. Although I'm Eastern Orthodox, Peter Enns' book is thoroughly orthodox, excellently argued, pastorally sensitive and ultimately game-changing for the Evangelical world. And although it seems many Orthodox are already talking Enns' game, to my knowledge, no one has written a book on the subject that actually tackles all the sticky exegetical issues. So Enns' book transcends the Protestant/Catholic/Orthodox divide. One thing Enns did leave out is what to do with the genealogies in scripture that mention Adam. If you are interested in a discussion of these, check out Daniel Harlow's article online entitled "After Adam: Reading Genesis in an Age of Evolutionary Science."
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 24, 2012
A
Verified Purchase
AlbMonk
Houston, US
★★★★★ 5
Opened My Eyes to a New View
Format: Kindle
Excellent book. Entirely changed the way that I have looked at the origins debate. I have been a lifelong literal creationist for most of my Christian life. But, in recent years I have begun to question this view and look a bit closer at how evolution could in fact be reconciled with the creation story. And, this book has most certainly helped with this journey. "The Evolution of Adam" is broken up into two major parts with each part broken up into several more detailed subsets: 1) Genesis: An Ancient Story of Israelite Self-definition; 2) Understanding Paul's Adam. It is from these two parts where Enns believes he can establish an understanding about the Genesis story, Adam, and where evolution could fit into the story. Using textual criticism, Enns makes numerous conclusions based on both biblical and extra-biblical resources. Here are just a few that I have observed: 1) The Genesis account is NOT a book about origins, but a wisdom book about Israel's identity as a chosen people. Never did the Jewish people claim or believe Genesis was about the origins of the world and humanity. 2) Enns also surmises that Genesis was likely written post-exilic by the prophet Ezra at a time when Israel had lost its identity in Babylonian captivity and were seeking a renewed national identity that had been lost. 3) The Genesis creation story closely resembles numerous other creation stories of Israel's neighboring cultures (i.e. Atrahasis, Enuma Elish, Gilgamesh). 4) That Adam was a proto-type of Israel (i.e. loved by God, disobeys Gods command, and suffers the consequences, exiled from the garden/Babylon). 5) That Paul's Adam was explained in the context of 1st century Judaism and was using Adam as a mere metaphor and example of spiritual death for both Jews and gentile alike. 6) Adam could have possibly been the first homo-sapien that became aware of his spiritual nature, but hominids could have existed prior to Adam. 7) Nowhere in the Old Testament and Jewish history was Adam known to be the conduit for which sin became an inherited nature passed on to all of mankind. Where I think this book is lacking is where evolution comes into play. Enns spends most of his time breaking down and dissecting the creation story, but spends very little time building up the evolution process and how it fits in. Nevertheless, we cannot dismiss the science of evolution at the expense of taking the creation/Adam account literally. There is wiggle room in these two ideologies to allow for both God's divine creation and scientific evolution. Great book. Must be read with an open mind. If you hold firmly to creationism and believe it to be the ONLY way, then this book is likely not for you. But, if you are open to the possibility that Genesis is not a scientific book about human origins, then you may find this to be quite good. Enns speaks in such a way that this book is not too academic and easy enough for the average layman to understand. it is highly recommended.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 17, 2014

recommand products