SKU: 19318648310
1 leaf pot plant

1 leaf pot plant Zephyranthes Labuffarosa Pink Rain lily

Sale price$26.67 Regular price$29.63
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $7.41 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Oct 11 - Oct 16

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

1 leaf pot plant Zephyranthes Labuffarosa Pink Rain lilyThis rain lily seems to have a personality all of its own. For our gardens in Texas, it performs more like our other fall bloomers (schoolhouse lilies, red spider lilies, Sternbergia, etc.) in that it often blooms on naked stalks in the late summer and fall as the cooler temperatures and rains appear. When planted in the ground, the foliage appears quickly after and lasts until a hard frost knocks it down. These blooms produce an abundance of color in

This rain lily seems to have a personality all of its own. For our gardens in Texas, it performs more like our other fall bloomers (schoolhouse lilies, red spider lilies, Sternbergia, etc.) in that it often blooms on naked stalks in the late summer and fall as the cooler temperatures and rains appear. When planted in the ground, the foliage appears quickly after and lasts until a hard frost knocks it down. These blooms produce an abundance of color in the fall when most things are dying back or giving out after a long summer!

How do you pronounce 'Labuffarosa'? La-boofa-rose-uh. Now, forgive me for not knowing the exact way to spell that out phonetically, but I hope that at least stops you from saying "la buff-uh." How we say it is closely related to where and how the bulb was discovered, and this is a great opportunity read more below about its discovery in Mexico by John Fairey and Carl Schoenfeld from Yucca Do Nursery. This is an interesting story, so be sure to read below.

What makes the 'Labuffarosa' unique? Be sure to click on the link and look at our rain lily page to see the obvious difference in rain lily bloom colors and style, but there are also other differences. These are best understood by comparing and contrasting the differences between the Zephyranthes 'Labuffarosa' and the large pink traditional Zephyranthes grandiflora.

1. Blooms on a Z. Labuffarosa are varying shades of light pink to almost white while the blooms on a Z. grandiflora are a dark, rich pink.

2. The Z. Labuffarosa begins to bloom in the summer occassionally but really begins it show in August/September and blooms well into the fall while the Z. grandiflora begins to bloom in June and by September the blooms are finishing up.

3. The foliage on the Z. Labuffarosa is dormant in the
summer (requiring less water) but starts growing in the fall and lasts to the first frost, whereas the Z. grandiflora is thick and full in the summer (requiring some irrigation or ample rain).

Summary Table:

Trait Zephyranthes 'Labuffarosa' Zephyranthes grandiflora Habranthus robustus
Flower Color Soft, blended pink Bright, vivid pink Pale/medium pink
Shape Upright, symmetrical Broad, open Tilted, asymmetrical
Height 6-9 in 6-10 in 10–14 in
Foliage Fine, grassy Wider, strap-like Thick, upright
Bloom Habit Rain or watering Rain triggers Rain, often before foliage
Bonus Refined, floriferous Showy, bold Wild look, graceful

We would encourage you to experience these differences personally by having both planting in your garden together! Not only would you start to enjoy the variability rain lilies bring to your garden, but you would also extend the season of color of these pinks bring to your garden.

Soil: This bulb does great planted in rocky or sandy soil. It has been known to grow in volcanic rock. If you have clay soil, simply add in some organic material, and this bulb should work great for you too. If you are going to plant this in a pot, be sure that the pot has good drainage and stays regularly watered during its growing season in later summer through early winter.

Sun: This is where the Z. 'Labuffarosa' really shines. This bulb can do well wherever you plant her. She will perform best in almost full sun. however, she does well in some summer shade also (give her at least 6 hours a day. That means you can plant her under trees that will lose their leaves in the winter or as a walkway border in full sun. When you look at the pictures, you notice that the blooms appear in everything from full sun to almost full shade. That's because the blooms, which appear in September, are planted under deciduous trees like live oaks or pecans where the foliage can collect all of the winter sun it needs. We have our row at the farm planted under a grove of post oak trees not far from one of our ponds.

Plant and Water: Plant the bulbs with about 2-3 inches of soil above them. You can plant the bulbs about 3 inches apart, but we think they look best in a clump together. Try planting 2 bulbs together in a hole. These rain lilies multiply quickly. They really require very little care after planting. You may just want to weed around them once in a while. That is another thing to love about plants that flourish in the fall...the weeds aren't as many. Make sure that your bulbs are not in standing water in the summer, but other than that they will do just fine.

Blooms: These small bulbs pack large blooms. In late August or September, after the fall rains begin, little shell-pink blooms will pop out of the ground. The bloom is only 6-12" tall, but they will draw one's eyes with their bright color when most bulbs have already quit producing. The blooms will open their petals to about the size of a half dollar. The bulbs will continue to produce blooms 2-3 days after each rain all the way until the first frost of November.

After the blooms: Little tufts of foliage appear. The foliage is a glossy green that looks attractive next to the wintery landscape. The foliage will last all winter if there is not a hard freeze. The foliage will die back with the first warm weather of the year (if a freeze has not sent it into dormancy), and the bulb will be dormant during the hot summer months. Be sure not to cut the foliage off too soon as the bulb needs the nutrients and sun energy that the foliage collects to get it through the summer.

In Pots: The bulb does great in containers! Sometimes you just want a fall pop of color on your porch or back patio. These diminutive blooms and greenery act as great fillers in larger containers with other plants - remember that pots want thrillers, fillers, and spillers. Keep in mind though that you may need to water your bulbs more often if they are in a container than if they are in the ground. In a pot, the Z. labuffarosa often sends up its foliage first, especially when:

  • You have been watering it regularly.

  • Temperatures are warm (above 70°F).

  • The bulbs are established (not newly planted)

**If you're keeping the pots dry and waiting for a "rain trigger," they may mimic in-ground behavior. But steady water = early foliage.


Animals: Like the other bulbs in the Amaryllis family, these bulbs and foliage are resistant to deer and other animals, but deer and rabbits will eat the flowers occasionally. This bulb attracts several beneficial animals. Butterflies, bees, and hummingbirds enjoy these rain lilies very much.

Landscaping hints: As I said before, this bulb is limited only by the space you have available. This delicate charmer looks good anywhere. You can certainly plant the bulbs along borders or rock gardens as an accent or to help define an area. You may also consider mass planting these bulbs to produce a dramatic fall display of color. As you are planning where to plant the bulbs, remember that you will have lovely foliage during the winter and into the spring so think about planting them next to a mailbox or sidewalk. Consider planting along with spring blooming bulbs which can take advantage of the green foliage.

What is the correct name for the ‘Labuffarosa’ rain lily?

Names: Can I offer a disclaimer first? We are not botanists. Naming plants is a science and is important. It can be confusing and tedious for many of us, and I will try to keep this narrative superficial and keep us out of the botanical weeds. My goal is to make this fun and entertaining. Why fun and entertaining? We remember better when something is fun and entertaining and there is a great story to tell here, a story that mentions many personalities and big names of modern plant explorers. These pioneers have done much to write about, discover, breed, and promote rain lilies for us all to love!

First there are many genus names for rain lilies, but let’s focus on Zephyranthes. Zephyr = Greek god of the west wind and “anthros” = flower. So to begin with, we have the flower of the god of the west wind, and you can read more about rain lilies on wikipedia here. Now let’s tackle the species name, or specific epithet, of this particular rain lily. The lines between the species name (in italics and all lower case) and cultivar name (single quotation marks and NOT italicized) are blurred. Some literature has a species name of Z. labufarosea (Thad Howard) and others have a cultivar name of ‘Labuffarosa’ (Scott Ogden) or ‘Labuffarosea’ (Pacific Bulb Society). Note there are two “f”s in those cultivar names and one ends with “rosa” and the other with “rosea.”

To summarize the common names, we could use the many common references we hear from sophisticated to very straight forward. Such as:

  • La Buffa Group
  • Labufarosea hybrids
  • Pink rain lilies
  • Pink Zephyr lilies
  • Pink fairy lilies
  • La Buffa Rosa

On our website, we will use Z. ‘Labuffarosa’ and use Scott Ogden’s “Garden Bulbs for the South” as our authority for the name. As a side note, on our printed materials that I have had for over 15 years such as our tags, you will see my second preference, Z. labufarosea.

The Origin Story of the ‘Labuffarosa’ Pink Rain Lily:

Why is Z. labufarosea our second naming choice? I’m glad you asked! Many times, plants are named based on where they are found, and this bulb was found on a plant hunting expedition in an isolated mountain range south of the Texas border in Mexico? Really? Yes!

Have you ever heard of the San Carlos Mountains in Mexico (aka Sierra de San Carlos) in the state of Tamaulipas, Mexico? Want to hear a song that brings a flavor of the region to your ears? Want to see a picture of the mountains? Would you like to hear about Texas native plantsman, Lynn Lowrey, helping two adventurous plant explorers John Fairey and Carl Schoenfeld start what would become over 100 plant expeditions into Mexico? Here, we’ll take a brief dive into Thad Howard’s book “Bulbs for Warm Climates” and look at Scott Ogden’s book “Garden Bulbs for the South.” We’ll also briefly explore the Pacific Bulb Societies page of the Z. ‘Labuffarosea’ group as well.

So, back briefly to where the bulb was found by John Fairey and Carl Schoenfeld from Yucca Do Nursery. It is important because for “commemorative” naming pronunciation rules, the scientific name should be generally be pronounced as the language of the person or place would pronounce it in that area. These were found near La Bufa Mountain, which would be pronounced “boof-uh.” I’m also making an assumption that La Bufa Mountain is referring to Bufa el Diente peak in the Sierra de San Carlos Mountains. Based on this fact, even with the spellings of two “f”s (i.e. ‘Labuffarosa’), I believe the pronunciation should still be la-boof-uh.

Let’s look at some quote about where the plant was found.

From Plant Delights Nursery, where Tony Avent and crew also sell the bulb here “This naturally-occurring hybrid rain lily was discovered by Yucca Do Nursery in 1990 at 4,000' in Tamaulipas, Mexico.”

This would coincide with other plant discoveries now grown at The John Fairey Garden , such as Salvia microphylla 'San Carlos Festival' that was “Collected in La Bufa, San Carlos Mountains, Tamaulipas, Mexico in 1992 and introduced in 1997.”

Thad Howard says in his book on page 53: "In Tamaulipas, a form has been found that is intermediate between C. [Cooperia] pedunculata and a pink native Zephyranthes. It was given the quaint identification of Z. labufarosea for commercial reasons, but the name has no scientific merit. It is obviously a natural hybrid, and has its own characteristics. The name Labufa (not "labuffa") suggests the mountain on which it is found, and rosea suggests the color of the flower. Thus the name could be translated as "the pink mountain." - Howard, T. (2001). Bulbs for Warm Climates. University of Texas Press.

The Pacific Bulb Society does a great job here with a brief description and a look into other selections : “Zephyranthes 'Labuffarosea' (syn. Z. sp. 'Labuffarosa') was found and collected by Carl Schoenfeld (owner of Yucca Do Nursery) and John Fairey (owner of Peckerwood Garden) in the Sierra Chiquita in the state of Tamaulipas, Mexico. The large flowers open in the afternoon and are variable from white to pink, also bicolors. Z. drummondii, Z. traubii and an unknown pink Z. species are found growing in the same area and Z. 'Labuffarosea' is suspected to be a natural hybrid of these species. Zephyranthes sp. 'Labuffarosea' (sometimes spelled as 'Labuffarosa' or 'Labuffarosae') is an unsubscribed species (or natural hybrid) that is widespread in cultivation. It is similar to Z. grandiflora, but the leaves are dark green leaves and the flowers open rather flat with very broad tepals.”

Lastly, we read from Scott Ogden on page 31 in his book: “In the neighboring state of Tamaulipas, John Fairey and Carl Schoenfield discovered another interesting rain lily. This undescribed species occurs in both pink and white editions and has a long blooming season…In the wild they are often seen clinging to crevices of volcanic rocks along with clusters of succulent hen-and-chicks (Echeveria runyonii). Thhe discoverers of this lovely plant have nicknamed their find Zephyranthes sp. ‘Labuffarosa’, the pink rain lily of La Buffa.” - Ogden, S. (2007). Garden Bulbs for the South 2nd ed. Timber Press.

If we were to distill all of this, the "San Carlos Mountains" probably refers to Sierra de San Carlos, also known as the Sierra Chiquita, which is an isolated mountain range in the state of Tamaulipas, Mexico (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sierra_de_San_Carlos). La Bufa Mountain probably refers to "Bufa El Diente." The Sierra de San Carlos has a semi-arid climate with hot summers and mild winters. This would explain why the Z. ‘Labuffarosa’ has done so well for us on the Southern Bulb farm in Texas in a spot where it is dry in the summer, and blooms/grows as fall comes along.

If you have a second to read about plant hunting adventures, I highly recommend reading this brief history of The John Fairey Gardens, as the early flower hunting adventures of Lynn Lowrey, John Fairey, and Carl Schoenfeld are related (https://jfgarden.org/about/):

“In 1988, five years after the tornado, John and Carl were invited by Lynn Lowrey to join him on a plant expedition trip to the Sierra Madre Oriental Mountains in northern Mexico to collect seeds and cuttings from rare and endangered plants.”

As they traveled south of the border, you can almost imagine hearing music such as this, named "La Sierra De San Carlos" a Song by Juan Villarreal y Ramiro Cavazos.

 

As the music, dancing, and regular life went on, your backdrop were the tips of this isolated mountain range, featuring Bufa El Diente peak. Every plant has a story, and we hope you plant this story in your garden life as well.

(Photo of Bufa El Diente By Comisión Mexicana de Filmaciones from México D. F., México - Sierra Chiquita, CC BY-SA 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=66038449 Sierra Chiquita with the isolated "tooth-like" Bufa El Diente protruding on the right. photographed 1 November 2010)

 


Remember you're planting a story, and these bulbs are for a lifetime!
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 19318648310

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell 1 leaf pot plant

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 15 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
A
Verified Purchase
AlbMonk
Charlottesville, US
★★★★★ 5
Opened My Eyes to a New View
Format: Kindle
Excellent book. Entirely changed the way that I have looked at the origins debate. I have been a lifelong literal creationist for most of my Christian life. But, in recent years I have begun to question this view and look a bit closer at how evolution could in fact be reconciled with the creation story. And, this book has most certainly helped with this journey. "The Evolution of Adam" is broken up into two major parts with each part broken up into several more detailed subsets: 1) Genesis: An Ancient Story of Israelite Self-definition; 2) Understanding Paul's Adam. It is from these two parts where Enns believes he can establish an understanding about the Genesis story, Adam, and where evolution could fit into the story. Using textual criticism, Enns makes numerous conclusions based on both biblical and extra-biblical resources. Here are just a few that I have observed: 1) The Genesis account is NOT a book about origins, but a wisdom book about Israel's identity as a chosen people. Never did the Jewish people claim or believe Genesis was about the origins of the world and humanity. 2) Enns also surmises that Genesis was likely written post-exilic by the prophet Ezra at a time when Israel had lost its identity in Babylonian captivity and were seeking a renewed national identity that had been lost. 3) The Genesis creation story closely resembles numerous other creation stories of Israel's neighboring cultures (i.e. Atrahasis, Enuma Elish, Gilgamesh). 4) That Adam was a proto-type of Israel (i.e. loved by God, disobeys Gods command, and suffers the consequences, exiled from the garden/Babylon). 5) That Paul's Adam was explained in the context of 1st century Judaism and was using Adam as a mere metaphor and example of spiritual death for both Jews and gentile alike. 6) Adam could have possibly been the first homo-sapien that became aware of his spiritual nature, but hominids could have existed prior to Adam. 7) Nowhere in the Old Testament and Jewish history was Adam known to be the conduit for which sin became an inherited nature passed on to all of mankind. Where I think this book is lacking is where evolution comes into play. Enns spends most of his time breaking down and dissecting the creation story, but spends very little time building up the evolution process and how it fits in. Nevertheless, we cannot dismiss the science of evolution at the expense of taking the creation/Adam account literally. There is wiggle room in these two ideologies to allow for both God's divine creation and scientific evolution. Great book. Must be read with an open mind. If you hold firmly to creationism and believe it to be the ONLY way, then this book is likely not for you. But, if you are open to the possibility that Genesis is not a scientific book about human origins, then you may find this to be quite good. Enns speaks in such a way that this book is not too academic and easy enough for the average layman to understand. it is highly recommended.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 17, 2014
W
Verified Purchase
West Virginia Born
Dallas, US
★★★★★ 5
Very insightful
Format: Paperback
I am a materialistic atheist and I liked this book a lot. Perhaps that is why Peter Enns lost his teaching position! I certainly would not agree with Enns on his religious views but I found his scholarship & willingness to stray from closed-minded literalism refreshing. I learned quite a bit about Paul and his modus operandi in dealing with OT passages. I was presented a way of thinking about Genesis that transcended "it's just a metaphor" or "its just an ancient myth". Basically, my take home messages were 1) the Bible was compiled in its final form during exilic/post-exilic times though it contains some much older material 2) the OT was written as a means of self-definition & self-explanation for the Jewish people after the trauma of exile 3) the Bible is "incarnational", meaning both divine & human (those who demand it be free of its chronological & cultural milieu are being unreasonable) 4) God can "inspire" by stooping to our level & it's unwise to tell God what he can & can't do in terms of revelation 5) the Bible has no intent to be scientific and historical in early Genesis 6) Paul is a bigger obstacle to accepting evolution to many Christians than Genesis 7) by tying Adam & Eve to original sin & origin of death, Paul re-shapes/reinterprets the story in a way that seems foreign to OT writers 8) rejecting evolution means rejecting Pauline theology for many and 9) Paul, who also re-writes OT meaning in Abraham (faith vrs law; "seed(s)", uses Adam to put Jew and gentile on equal footing in needing grace/Christ's sacrifice/obedience for salvation. Christ, as second Adam, undoes damage of first Adam for ALL (Jew & gentile) willing to accept the gift of grace. Paul uses midrash/pesher arguments for his Christological interpretations with "creative engagement" of OT texts. Again, while Enns and I probably have very little common ground for agreement, I appreciated the book & was struck by this passage at the end: "...the light of science does not shine with equal brightness in every corner. There is mystery. There is transcendence. By faith I believe that the Christian story has deep access to a reality that materialism cannot provide and cannot be expected to know. That is a confession of faith, I readily admit, but when it comes to accessing ultimate reality, we are all in the same boat, materialistic atheists included: at some point we must trust in something or someone beyond logic and evidence, even if it is to declare that there is nothing beyond what we see." While I wouldn't agree totally with that statement, it strikes me as very honest, sincere & open-minded. Good book whether you agree or disagree with it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 13, 2012
K
Verified Purchase
Kathy Sund prescher
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 4
For those that really Want to know!
Format: Paperback
I chose this rating because of the excellence of content. This author has chosen to give us, those who are truly seeking answers to difficult questions, the possibilities in finding closure or agreement with the very difficult task of merging Science, and all it entails, with our faith. I always feel pulled both ways with ther being no logical way to blend the two, I then felt I must have to give up one for the other but could not do so. This book has helped me begin the journey of understanding what I've always known to be true but could not put together. They do work. There are logical explanations for the seeming opposites of scripture and science. It's a Very important read. For years I have wished C.S. Lewis was still alive. He i have turned to for so many things. But with so many advances since his death, I have needed new thoughts as like minded as he . There are more Lewises out there!!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 24, 2013
M
Verified Purchase
michaelshive
Grantham, US
★★★★★ 3
Thought-provoking but misses its "target audience"
Format: Paperback
First, the good. This is a thought-provoking book that takes complex subject matter and makes it very easy to understand. In "The Evolution of Adam" Dr. Enns does an excellent job on many fronts - most notably giving a brief overview of the history of biblical criticism and its importance to the evolution debate. His ability to distill ideas down to the core was impressive. If I had to recommend to someone 50 pages on biblical criticism I might tell them to read the first portion of this book. However, as I read the book I kept wondering how the path he was taking would allow him to argue for an Evangelical perspective (as he says in the introduction). In short, he does not. Not even close. Dr. Enns must not know his target audience very well if he thinks that this book is targeted for Evangelicals. Virtually none of the positions that he espouses in this book are even close to what an Evangelical Christian would be comfortable defending. He has little regard for any historicity behind any of the biblical accounts and frequently tosses out the phrase "most scholars agree" as a trump card. He does a good job of helping understand the culture and history that surrounded the biblical accounts yet in the end the reader is left wondering where story and history actually meet or if possibly the whole thing was simply conjured up for political reasons. In the end, I think the question the reader is left with is "does it matter if anything in the Bible ACTUALLY happened?". How you answer that may well determine how much you enjoy this book.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 24, 2012
J
Verified Purchase
J. Thomas Campbell
Louisville, US
★★★★★ 5
Peter Enns "Upends" Tradition!
Format: Paperback
One cannot but deeply admire what Peter Enns has managed to produce within the span of less than 150 pages - not counting his endnotes. Kudos as well for his penetrating exegetical insights...to say nothing as regards his courage: few conservative evangelicals (and even fewer fundamentalists) will find the title "The Evolution of Adam" something that warms the heart. And yet what Enns has produced here not only is revolutionary (in a very real sense - see below) but may well prove to be one of the more controversial books on the science/theology debate of recent years. Why so? Primarily because (according to Enns - Part Two of his book) Paul's creative use (in Romans) of the Adam and Eve story in Genesis was primarily for apologetic purposes...a matter that will be discussed in greater detail below. But we begin with Part One. Essentially Part One (four chapters) represents Enns' understanding of the crucial importance Ancient Near Eastern influences exerted upon the biblical writers - the writer/s of the Genesis creation account in particular. Enns (correctly in my view)hammers this point repeatedly for the reader to consider - i.e., the bible (the whole of it) was not written in a cultural vacuum unsullied by the surrounding culture/s of pagan religious thought, whether ancient Sumerian, Babylonian, or Greco-Roman. Indeed, to do otherwise would have been an impossibility - somewhat like trying to walk along the Tibetan foothills while refusing to breathe its polluted 'pagan' air. None of us ever fully escapes the surrounding influences of culture - and the bible was never intended to do so; rather, God (if one believes in biblical inspiration...as Enns does) works fully within the conceptual categories of culture. Hence, the two creation accounts in Genesis come to us fully embedded with the concepts of Ancient Near Eastern thought patterns. Perhaps the most we can say here is that the Genesis accounts represent (in varying ways) the "demythologizing" of prior Ancient Near Eastern accounts: the God of Israel is not to be identified with any aspect (sun, moon, stars, etc.) of the created order. So far so good. There's nothing really new here that hasn't been said already by any number of conservative evangelical scholars. Part Two, however, is something entirely different. Here Enns focuses his attention on Paul's creative use of the Old Testament, seeing as how the death and resurrection of Christ has caused Paul to look at the OT writings from a radically different perspective - Romans 5:12-21 in particular. These verses have a long, long history in the Christian Church as providing the church's understanding of how sin and death entered the world of human existence: we all "inherited" sin and death in and through the disobedience of Adam back in Eden. Not so...says Enns. And here is where his account veers off in a direction entirely different from traditional orthodox belief - for, according to Enns, Paul gave a particular 'Pauline spin' to these verses that cannot be found either in the OT itself, or in the Second Temple Judaism of which Paul himself was a part. Because the death and resurrection of Christ radically altered Paul's understanding of God's redemptive work in the world he (Paul) "found" in the Adam story an ideal explanation for why it is all Jews and Gentiles alike share in the universal experience of sin and death. Therefore, Adam's disobedience in Eden is NOT the cause of the universal human experience of sin and death (per Enns); rather, the story of Adam's disobedience served Paul's apologetic purposes...quite apart from whatever the story's original intention might have been. The true "origin" of sin and death remains a mystery, for the answer is not to be found (indeed if it can be "found" at all!) in the early Genesis account of Adam and Eve. And here is where we encounter the book's controversial nature, for Enns' view represents a dramatic departure from the traditional view - a traditional view that has a rich theological heritage that passes directly through the Reformation all the way back to Augustine. As previously stated, I deeply admire and respect what Enns has done here. For the most part I think he is on the right track. Furthermore, he makes mention of the fact that recent developments in biology have strongly indicated that we cannot possibly trace all modern humans back to an original "Adam and Eve." However, we knew that already...quite apart from modern biology informing us of the fact. Anthropology and paleontology had already amassed considerable evidence that proto-humans and modern humans were spread across the earth long before any conceivable Adam and Eve could have existed. Apparently, however, modern biology speaks with a more powerful voice than anthropology; thus, we are seeing a spate of books recently on the topic of whether or not Adam and Eve were historical - Enns' book being only one of a growing number. (Due to the geneologies in early Genesis we are somewhat limited in "how far back" we can place an Adam and Eve. Placing them 25 to 40 thousand years into the past in order somehow to allow them to be the true ancestors of all modern humans does a grave injustice to the geneologies that plain and simply do not allow for this sort of radical time reversal - a matter that any number of evangelicals, who have done this sort of thing, seem unwilling to appreciate. The early Genesis geneologies, even allowing for some "gaps," serve as a control against such unwarranted time expansion. An Adam and Eve of perhaps 6 to 8 thousand BC appears to be about the limit of what we can reasonably expect). In any case, Enns has raised a thorny and difficult issue in a way previous books on the question have not, and I believe his book will contribute substantially to more open theological discussion (one hopes without heated rancor) on the debate. In the meanwhile, some final thoughts. Personally, I find it more than a tad curious that David Rohl (a somewhat controversial Egyptologist) has recently authored a book (From Eden to Exile, Greenleaf Press) in which he strongly defends an historical Adam - and yet Rohl acknowledges that he is an atheist. All this is most strange: an evangelical scholar arguing against an historical Adam while an atheistic historian argues for one! ("What fools these mortals be!") I happen to agree with much of what Enns writes. However, I think Rohl has a point- even though how he fleshes his historical Adam out is somewhat bizarre. For one thing, I'm not entirely comfortable (despite some of Enns' powerful arguments) with a geneology of Jesus in the Gospels that would include "fictious" characters who never even existed. (I might as well inform you that my great, great grandfather was Dr. Jekyll and my great, great, great grandfather was Mr. Hyde). I don't see why getting rid of an historical Adam is at all necessary. Enns himself offers the possibility that OT Israel viewed Adam as their senior partriarch - the man who originally started the "clan." I personally see great possibilities here via leaving Adam within historical existence as Israel's original, grand patriarch. The origin of sin and death via the Adam and Eve story is another matter entirely. Biology and anthropology together appear to just plain and simply rule it out - and sticking Adam back into the age of the Cro-Magnons and Neaderthals in order to "save" the doctrine is a clear instance of an act of sheer desperation. But I see no reason why we necessarily have to conclude that the "origin" of sin and death (if that's the right word even to use...which I'm not even sure about) can only be regarded as lost in the misty past. I think there is a possible way forward here, and even via an historical Adam, while at the same time embracing what Enns is talking about. I think there may well be a way to retain a personal Adam (perhaps 6 to 8 thousand BC), while also showing how sin and death had their origin in him...but with an entirely different understanding that is informed by Enns' book. Unfortunately, spelling all that out is - like "The Evolution of Adam" - a book unto itself. And Amazon commentary is not the place where one is allowed to "write a book" - quite apart from how lengthy my own commentary here has been. In the meanwhile...kudos again to Enns for his truly provocative and highly insightful contribution to the cause. His vigorous defense of the incarnation, the atonement, and the resurrection is profoundly gratifying. Because of his firm stance here no one can accuse him of being unorthodox! (NOTE: Readers interested in a critical analysis of David Rohl's "From Eden to Exile: the 5000 Year History of the People of the Bible," and why this book is of such strategic importance for Old Testament studies - scholars in particular, can easily access my recent review of this book (titled "David Rohl: A "Maverick" in Search of History") by clicking on "See All My Reviews" directly above, or by going to the book's Amazon website. Hope you enjoy the read!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 18, 2012

recommand products