SKU: 21166230219
buy birds nest fern online

buy birds nest fern online Shop 'Bird's Nest Fern - Asplenium nidus' Care & Info

Sale price$25.11 Regular price$27.90
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $6.97 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Sep 3 - Sep 8

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

buy birds nest fern online Shop 'Bird's Nest Fern - Asplenium nidus' Care & InfoThe Birds Nest Fern, known as Asplenium nidus, is a striking fern prized for its bold, wavy fronds and lush, sculptural appearance. This fern is especially admired for how it naturally creates a nest of fronds that gently unfurl from a central point, resembling a birds nesthence the common name. Native to the tropical rainforests of Southeast Asia, Australia, and the Pacific Islands, Birds Nest Fern thrives in warm, humid, and shaded environments. In

The Bird’s Nest Fern, known as Asplenium nidus, is a striking fern prized for its bold, wavy fronds and lush, sculptural appearance. This fern is especially admired for how it naturally creates a “nest” of fronds that gently unfurl from a central point, resembling a bird’s nest—hence the common name. 

Native to the tropical rainforests of Southeast Asia, Australia, and the Pacific Islands, Bird’s Nest Fern thrives in warm, humid, and shaded environments. In the wild, it often grows epiphytically, nestled high in tree canopies where it collects organic debris and moisture. This natural habitat gives clues to how it prefers to be grown at home: warm, indirect light and high humidity are key. 

The bird’s nest fern plant features bright, glossy green fronds that grow in a circular rosette pattern, giving the plant a neat, symmetrical look.

Unlike many ferns that have finely divided leaves, Asplenium nidus has broad, tongue-shaped fronds with rippled or wavy margins.

These leathery leaves add strong architectural interest and a bold textural contrast in both houseplant collections and tropical landscape beds.

When mature, Bird’s Nest Fern can reach about 4 feet tall and 3 feet wide, depending on conditions.

Indoors, it typically stays closer to the lower end of that size range unless given ample humidity and consistent warmth.

It does not grow aggressively or require frequent pruning, making it a low-maintenance plant for those who want lush greenery without the fuss.

The Bird’s Nest Fern does not produce flowers in the traditional sense, as it is a true fern and reproduces via spores. These spores are produced in small rows or dots on the undersides of mature fronds. While not as showy as flowers, the reproductive structures give the plant a botanical charm and interest for fern collectors and hobbyists. 

One of the unique aspects of Asplenium nidus is its adaptability as both an indoor and outdoor plant in warmer climates, as well as its ability to improve air quality. It is often placed in bathrooms and kitchens thanks to its love of humidity and tolerance of indirect light.  

When and How to Water Your Bird’s Nest Fern 

The Bird’s Nest Ferns are mildly drought-tolerant; they store water in their leathery fronds. Always water thoroughly when the top 1–2 inches of soil feel dry. Avoid letting the soil completely dry out, especially during active growth, as it can cause browning tips and stunt development. Bird's Nest Ferns should be watered deeply every 5-7 days from spring to early fall, then reduced to once every 10-14 days in winter. 

From March to September, during the growing season, water every 5–7 days using about 1/3 to 1/2 cup for small to medium pots, making sure water drains freely. Keep humidity high and mist occasionally if your indoor air is dry. Avoid watering directly into the rosette to prevent rot. 

From October to February, during the dormant period, reduce watering to once every 10–14 days with smaller quantities, around 1/4 cup for medium containers. Let the soil mostly dry out between watering, but never become bone dry. Lower light and cooler air will slow the plant’s water needs. 

Light Requirements – Where to Place Your Bird's Nest Fern 

When growing indoors, the Bird’s Nest Fern thrives in bright indirect light for 6–8 hours daily, avoiding direct sunlight to protect its fronds.

Place your fern near an east-facing window or a few feet away from a south or west window filtered with sheer curtains.

It can tolerate low light but will grow more slowly. Rotate the pot occasionally to maintain even foliage.

When grown outdoors, place your Bird’s Nest Fern in bright filtered light or dappled shade for 4–6 hours a day, never in full sun.

Morning sun or deep shade under trees or patios is ideal. Avoid harsh midday rays that can burn the fronds. For either setting, too little light causes slow growth and pale leaves, while too much causes crisping or browning.  

Optimal Soil & Fertilizer Needs 

Bird’s Nest Fern thrives in loose, well-draining, and slightly acidic soil rich in organic matter. Planet Desert has specialized potting soil, opens in a new tabGo to soil cactus mix blend 1 gal 4 qt cacti succulent dirt compost growing media that includes an organic substrate with mycorrhizae to help with the growth of a healthy root system and help your bird's nest fern thrive. Avoid compacted or overly sandy soils that dry out too fast. 

Fertilize your bird’s nest fern once a year in the spring with a balanced liquid NPK fertilizer of about 5-10-5. Over-fertilizing causes frond burns and salt buildup, so avoid feeding in the dormant season. In winter, skip fertilizing completely. The plant’s metabolism slows down and doesn’t need nutrients during rest. 

Bird’s Nest Fern Indoor Requirements 

When growing indoors, Bird’s Nest Fern thrives in temperatures between 65°F and 80°F, with humidity levels of at least 50% and exposure to filtered bright light. These tropical ferns are native to humid rainforests, so maintaining warmth and moisture indoors is key. Keep them away from air conditioners, heating vents, and drafty windows to avoid cold or dry air stress. Ideal indoor spots include bathrooms or kitchens where humidity is naturally higher. If needed, place the pot on a pebble tray with water or use a humidifier to boost the surrounding moisture. 

Hardiness Zones & More 

When growing outdoors, it is hardy in USDA zones 10–11 and prefers temperatures above 55°F, with bright indirect light and 60–80% humidity.

If temperatures dip below 50°F, bring it indoors.

Place in shaded patios, under canopies, or in fern gardens where moisture and shade are consistent.

Extended cold or dry wind exposure can cause frond browning and leaf drop, so protect accordingly. This plant is native to tropical rainforests and needs similar conditions. 

Wildlife – Bird’s Nest Fern Attract the Following Friendly Pollinators 

The Bird’s Nest Fern still attracts helpful insects like beneficial wasps, hoverflies, and frogs due to its moisture and form. Its wide, bowl-like rosette traps moisture, drawing in insects and tiny animals that help regulate pest populations. It’s a passive part of a healthy garden ecosystem. 

According to the ASPCA, Bird’s Nest Fern is non-toxic to dogs, cats, and horses, making it a safe choice for pet-friendly homes. This makes it ideal for indoor placement where curious pets roam. 

How to Propagate Your Asplenium nidus 

Bird’s Nest Fern is most commonly propagated by division, not spores like other ferns. To divide, remove the plant from its pot and gently separate offshoots or pups with attached roots. Use clean, sharp scissors or hands and pot the divisions in fresh, moist soil. Avoid disturbing the central rosette, as it is the plant’s main growth point. Keep new plants warm and humid, with indirect light, until well-rooted. 

Key Takeaways

  1. Bird’s Nest Fern is known for its bright green, leathery fronds with ruffled or wavy edges that grow in a circular rosette, mimicking a bird’s nest.
  2. As a true fern, it doesn’t bloom; instead, it reproduces by releasing spores from the undersides of mature fronds.
  3. It thrives in humidity-rich environments like bathrooms and kitchens, making it a natural choice for tropical-style interiors.
  4. This fern helps improve indoor air quality by filtering out pollutants and adding fresh oxygen to enclosed spaces.
  5. According to the ASPCA, Asplenium nidus is non-toxic to cats and dogs, making it a safe and stylish option for pet owners.

The Bottom Line 

Overall, the Bird’s Nest Fern (Asplenium nidus) is a striking, easy-to-care-for fern that brings lush tropical greenery into any indoor or shaded outdoor space. With its ruffled, upright fronds forming a nest-like crown, it offers unique texture and visual interest. It’s moderately drought-tolerant, safe for pets, thrives in high humidity, and is a perfect match for beginners looking for non-fussy foliage. Whether used in containers, bathrooms, or as part of a shade garden, it rewards minimal effort with maximum impact. 

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 21166230219

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell buy birds nest fern online

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.3 ★★★★★
Based on 9 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
U
UJ
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 5
Comprehensive, invaluable resource
Format: Hardcover, Format: Hardcover
This set is just massive. There is so much depth and insight, I don't know that I'll ever get to it all. One could literally read these volumes cover to cover because they're simply interesting and thought provoking. That said, I think it's best taken in small doses, perhaps focusing on single verses as they arise in daily life or in bible study. The physical quality of the volumes is top notch as well. This set would work well in a private library but could be equally appropriate for a church library. Absolutely recommended.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 19, 2025
P
Peter P
Natrona Heights, US
★★★★★ 5
Valued study tool
Format: Hardcover
This resource is phenomenal. I’ve been including this commentary set in my resources to teach through the minor prophets, and I find myself really appreciating its solid, accurate, grace-filled contents. This includes the ESV text, supporting timelines, graphics, and charts, and expansive commentary supporting the text. This set will be a valued study tool for years to come.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 20, 2025
A
Andrew D. Lossing
Chelsea, US
★★★★★ 5
Imposing and Exceptional Quality
Format: Hardcover
The content and quality of the ESV commentary series matches that of their study Bibles. Broadly reformed, but not dogmatic on a particular angle, clear and concise, great for study. This commentary set isn't so much for digging deep in the weeds as it is for learning a solid Biblical Theology-based framework of the Bible. It's simpler than some, but much more in-depth than the ESV Study Bible, making it the next step for learning. The full set is imposing - lovely big, black hardbacks which look phenomenal on a bookshelf. Do I think this is practical for everybody? No, it might not be. You can get this kind of thing in digital form in one way or another these days (please understand that I don't like to go quite that digital, and I haven't researched what all is available). If you're pressed for living space, you might not want these. I live with a spouse in a midsize one-bedroom apartment. Fortunately, we already knew we wanted to prioritize some of our space for physical books, because we find pleasure in them. I will have to clear off some of my existing bookshelf space and relegate some books to a box in storage (consider that this set takes up all the space in a fairly large packing box, and you'll know how much you need). But it's worth it for me. I also see the acquisition of this box set as a bit of a prompt to take back up more in-depth study of the Scripture, which too often gets sidetracked by the rest of life getting in the way. Having the physical books are already something of a commitment. If all I had were ebooks or an app, I would likely never utilize them the same way. Last notes: these were packed very well. Each volume is shrink-wrapped in cellophane and none of the corners were damaged. They did a good job with that. Lastly, the price for these is fairly high. I acknowledge that. I think theological books are about on the same level, usually, however. So I did not see the need to deduct a star.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 30, 2025
P
Verified Purchase
Patrick S.
Dallas, US
★★★★★ 5
A fun and fulfilling book - would love to own the series
Format: Paperback
I had a lot of fun with this book. About a year ago, I really came down on the side of presuppositionalism and have studied the approach, see if it was useful against two of the leading atheistic books (God Is Not Great and The God Delusion), and now I wanted to match it up against four other views of apologetics. I will try to not go into too much detail here as I think the book is an important read for developing an apologetic standpoint. The book follows the 1)"model of Approach X is presented" then 2) "Response from other 4 approaches to counter Approach X" and then move on to the next approach. The book allows final statements from each writer for a final opportunity. Steven Cowan has a good introduction and epilogue that bookends the book well. Craig (Classical Approach) really surprised me as he brings in the role of the Holy Spirit early into the conversation. I really thought I was going to just be reading the finer points of the Kalam argument he's known for. The role of the Holy Spirit is reflected in the other authors' approaches as well and that was nice to see. It's also nice to see Craig debating with Christians for once and it's here that you really get to see his thought process contrasting with other people with the same worldview. There are issues that Craig tries to bring up against the presuppositionist view point that could be applied for him. He doesn't seem to get that all foundations are, by definition, circular because if you can appeal to something more foundational, then your foundation isn't your foundation at all. Craig seems to bring in some higher concepts about probability to make some of his points and I think that's really a miss for anyone who's not a high level philosopher (and even some philosophers might have issues understand what he's talking about here). Habermas (Evidential Approach) seems to have an undue hatred for presuppositionalism. He's also another person who doesn't realize that the approach he uses isn't really the foundation he is starting from. I think he resents doing the hard work that the other approaches then build up to. Feinberg (Cumulative Case Approach) seems to miss the point of presuppositionalism entirely. He's got the approach of what I call the "shotgun approach" in the sense that he wants to use everything possible and sees what he hits. Frame (Presuppostional Approach) does an ok job with presenting the method. I don't think he would be my first choice in representing the approach. He doesn't do a good job of explaining the "problem of circularity" isn't a problem. He just does an "ok" job. Clark (Reformed Epistemological Approach) is one I was excited to read. I liked some of his points he made when talking about the other approaches. Then I read his approach and was extremely disappointed. The biggest flaw is that he states literally that his approach doesn't help to show the Christian God is real. I would say then your apologetic method is worthless and not a real method at all. I understand the R.E. approach but if I went only with Clark's explanation and argumentation, I wouldn't have even considered it a real area of focus. The book is well laid out, the footnotes are at the bottom of the pages (SO helpful!), Cowan does a good job of wrangling the writers and offering expanded reading and other authors for each area of focus. Myself and my mentor spent from January to August every other week going over and discussing the book. Finding flaws, comparing and contrasting, and seeing where points were made and where points were missed. I think the biggest deficit we found was that the writers tended to assume agreement on definitions of words that played a big role (for example - the word "evidence" NEEDED to be defined right off the bat by every author and it wasn't until Frame in his response to the objections raised did we even have one person define it). My suggestion for this book to maximize the fun is to pick a method and try and defend that method throughout; even with the writer arguing your side. My book is filled with notes and highlights that just made this book a great enjoyment to meet and discuss with a fellow Believer about. It does not settle all the issues, but it does help you focus on the fact that we still aren't done learning yet. Final Grade - A-
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 13, 2013
L
Verified Purchase
Lyndon Unger
Houston, US
★★★★★ 4
Great Introduction to the Various Schools of Apologetics
Format: Paperback
In reading "Five Views on Apologetics", I first had to wonder why the book was called "Five Views" and not "Three Views", since the first three authors admittedly had so much in common with each other that it seemed that their positions were subcategories of a singular system of apologetics. In fact, Habermas claimed Craig as an evidentialist on multiple occasions and admitted they had relatively minor disagreements. Feinberg was also an evidentialist, but he differed from Habermas and Craig in supposing that any one argument could possibly be persuasive to a skeptic. All three individuals definitely agreed on so much though that their three essays proved to be slightly disappointing as in the end, I figured that any one of them practically utilized a combination of all three approaches (I've heard Craig make cumulative case presentations...). I wondered exactly why they were representing different apologetic camps. Don't get me wrong: I like Craig and Hambermas and Feinberg; they're brothers in the Lord. I just find that evidentialism's off-shoots are so similar to each other that taking three chapters for the various forms of evidentialism didn't seem that worthwhile. Ironically, it seemed that the other two views of were related by what seemed like a mutual distaste for the other, Frame wrote that he "was rather disappointed at Clark's treatment of the role of the Bible in determining apologetic principles" (310) and the suggestion that Clark might not have "tried hard enough to find out what the Bible says" (310) also seemed like a needless jab, but Frame still commended Clark on plenty and suggested that "presuppositionalists too are Reformed epistemologists" (312). On the other hand, Clark wrote that Frame's essay is "the best version of presuppositionalism I have ever read" but then went on to suggest that presuppositionalism (at least as presented by Van Til) was either too confusing for him or was "obviously false" (255). Clark parroted the often repeated gross misunderstanding of presuppositionalism that "non-christians cannot know anything" (256), suggested that Frame implied this concept (257) and then spent several paragraphs refuting an obviously silly postulate; it's strange how Clark would insinuate that Frame would be so plainly stupid and I got the idea that Clark thought that all presuppositional apologists were somehow mentally lacking. Even in my early reading of Van Til, I understood that he was writing about how unbelievers cannot account for how they know anything, not whether or not they can know anything. What was even more alarming was Clarks' confession that "anyone can find some support for his or her position in Scripture" (275), as if scripture lacks a clear meaning and is somehow malleable enough to consistently conform to anyone's presuppositions. I was left dissatisfied by how Clark didn't seem to exhibit reformed theology and I was also puzzled why Frame didn't present the Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God (the main positive argument of presuppositionalism). What was even more humerous was how Craig presented a fairly solid version of the transcendental argument and gave Frame a slight poke for not presenting the "main course" of presuppositionalism. On the whole, I found "Five Views" to be reflective of much of my general feelings of the current state of apologetics; too distracted, too unscriptural, and too confusing. It was a difficult read at times; William Lane Craig's constant scampering into symbolic logic was frustrating and made me wonder whether the publisher clearly communicated the target audience to the authors. I was disappointed that none of the authors attempted to establish any component of their case from scriptural exegesis but instead presented philosophical constructs aided by proof texts (i.e. Habermas referenced Romans 8:16 on page 97 as `proof' that the Holy Spirit may work through apologetics to bring "full assurance to believers", arguably not the meaning of Romans 8:16). I also found myself wondering if the authors were agreeing on theological points due to lack of clarity (i.e. Craig's writing about the inner witness of the Holy Spirit was general enough that it sounded Mormon...). The book was good, and it DID expose me to five (arguably) different apologetic systems, but I hesitate to give it 5 stars due to some of the weak/unclear presentations of the systems and the thought that this isn't the best that evangelicalism has to offer. It's still a worthwhile buy and I'm likely being too hard on it. I'd recommend it as an intro book for a college level Apologetics class, or for someone who's already familiar with theology and the concept of apologetics but isn't familiar with it in depth.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 4, 2009

recommand products