SKU: 35422361897
can i mix orchid bark with potting soil

can i mix orchid bark with potting soil Molly's Bark-Based Mix for Orchids

Sale price$20.69 Regular price$22.99
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $5.75 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Oct 2 - Oct 7

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

can i mix orchid bark with potting soil Molly's Bark-Based Mix for OrchidsQuick answer: what is Molly's Orchid Mix? For: Phalaenopsis, Cattleya, Oncidium, Dendrobium, Vanda, and every other epiphytic orchid. What's in it: coarse fir bark, horticultural charcoal, perlite, and sphagnum accent. No peat moss, no soil. Why it works: orchids are epiphytes. In the wild their roots grip tree bark, not dirt. The chunky bark structure mimics that native environment, drains in seconds, and lets roots breathe. Holds shape for 12 to 18

Quick answer: what is Molly's Orchid Mix?

  • For: Phalaenopsis, Cattleya, Oncidium, Dendrobium, Vanda, and every other epiphytic orchid.
  • What's in it: coarse fir bark, horticultural charcoal, perlite, and sphagnum accent. No peat moss, no soil.
  • Why it works: orchids are epiphytes. In the wild their roots grip tree bark, not dirt. The chunky bark structure mimics that native environment, drains in seconds, and lets roots breathe.
  • Holds shape for 12 to 18 months. Most bagged orchid mixes break down to fines in 6 months and start to rot roots from below.
  • Pre-rinsed so you can pot straight from the bag without leaching salts.

More orchid-specific guidance: Do orchids need soil?, Best potting mix for orchids: complete guide.

Orchids are not soil plants. In nature most cultivated orchids are epiphytes, growing on tree bark with their roots exposed to air, catching rain and humidity. Pot them in regular potting soil and the roots suffocate, rot, and the plant dies, often within a single watering cycle. The right orchid potting mix is bark-based, fast-draining, and air-rich.

Molly's Orchid Mix delivers exactly that. Coarse fir bark as the structural base, horticultural charcoal to keep the mix sweet, plus a light proportion of moisture-retaining organics so roots don't dehydrate between waterings. Built for the way orchids actually grow.

What is orchid potting mix?

Orchid potting mix (sometimes called orchid pot mixture, orchid soil, or orchid potting medium) is a chunky, soilless growing medium made primarily from bark, charcoal, and small percentages of moisture-retaining materials. Despite the name, real orchid potting mix contains no actual soil. The "soil" in those product names is a marketing convention, not a description of what's in the bag.

A proper orchid potting mix should:

  • Drain almost immediately when water is poured through it
  • Hold its chunky structure for 1 to 2 years before breaking down
  • Allow constant air contact with the roots between waterings
  • Contain no peat, no garden soil, and no compost as primary ingredients

If a product labeled "orchid soil" feels heavy and dense out of the bag, it's the wrong product. A real orchid mix feels chunky, light, and rough.

What's in the bag

  • Coarse fir bark: the foundation. Mimics the tree-trunk substrate of wild epiphytes, providing the air pockets and grip orchid roots evolved for.
  • Horticultural charcoal: absorbs salts and impurities. Critical for orchids because they're sensitive to mineral buildup from tap water.
  • Coir chips: a small percentage of moisture buffer between waterings. Without some moisture retention, you'd be watering daily.
  • Sphagnum moss (light proportion): retains humidity right at the root crown. Especially important for Phalaenopsis grown in dry indoor air.

Low organic content overall, no soil, minimal peat. The roots stay dry between waterings, then drink fast when watered.

Genera this is for

Designed for epiphytic orchids:

  • Phalaenopsis (moth orchids): by far the most common houseplant orchid. This mix is dialed in for them.
  • Cattleya, Oncidium, Dendrobium, Vanda: all bark-loving epiphytes that thrive in this mix.
  • Brassavola, Encyclia, Miltonia: same family, same care.

Not for: terrestrial orchids (some Cymbidium, Paphiopedilum lady slippers, Bletilla) which prefer a soilier substrate. For those, blend this mix with a small amount of fine bark and worm castings, or contact us for specific recommendations.

Comparing your orchid potting mix options

Option Cost / 5 qt Effort Result quality
Bagged "orchid soil" from box stores $5 to $10 Low Inconsistent. Often too fine, sometimes contains soil or peat.
DIY blend (bark + perlite + charcoal) $15 to $25 with leftover ingredients Medium. Source 3 to 4 ingredients, mix to ratio, pre-soak the bark. High if you get the ratios right. Steep first-time learning curve.
Molly's Orchid Mix (this product) ~$22 None. Open and pot. Consistent. Calibrated for Phalaenopsis, Cattleya, and Dendrobium.

The honest comparison: bagged "orchid soil" from box stores is a coin flip. Some products are good, many are repackaged peat-based potting soil that will kill an orchid. DIY makes economic sense if you grow many orchids and don't mind the upfront sourcing work. Pre-blended is the right call for everyone else, especially if you've already lost an orchid to wrong soil.

Sizing & coverage

One 5 dry quart bag of Molly's Orchid Mix fills approximately:

  • About 10 four-inch pots
  • About 6 five-inch pots
  • About 4 six-inch pots
  • About 2 to 3 eight-inch pots

Most Phalaenopsis sold at supermarkets come in 5 or 6 inch pots, so a single bag handles 2 to 4 typical repots. Choose a pot just slightly larger than the existing root mass; orchids prefer to be tight in their pots.

When to repot

Repot every 1 to 2 years, or sooner if any of these are true:

  • The bark has broken down into smaller chunks (it should still feel chunky, not mushy)
  • The mix smells sour or stagnant
  • Roots are climbing out of the pot in protest
  • The plant has just finished a flowering cycle (best time to repot)

Avoid repotting an orchid that's actively spiking or in bloom. Wait until flowering ends.

Watering with bark mix (it's different)

Bark mix dries out faster than soil and rehydrates more slowly. Use the soak-and-drain method:

  1. Take the orchid to a sink. Pour room-temperature water through the pot until it runs out the drainage holes for several seconds.
  2. Let it drain completely (5 to 10 minutes).
  3. Return to its growing spot.
  4. Repeat when the bark feels dry about an inch down, typically every 7 to 10 days for Phalaenopsis indoors.

Never let the orchid sit in a saucer of water. Drainage is non-negotiable.

FAQ

Will this work for moth orchids (Phalaenopsis)?

Yes. Phalaenopsis is the primary use case. The bark + charcoal + light moisture-retainer ratio is tuned for them.

What's the difference between orchid soil and orchid potting mix?

None in practice. Both terms describe the same product: a chunky, soilless growing medium for orchids. "Soil" is the more common search term; "mix" is the more accurate description. The key thing is the ingredients on the bag, not the marketing word.

Is this the same as orchid bark?

Bark is one ingredient. Orchid potting mix is bark blended with charcoal, coir chips, and a small amount of sphagnum. Pure bark dries out too fast for most home growers; the moisture-retaining components in this mix prevent that.

Can I use regular potting soil if I add perlite?

No. Even with extra drainage, soil compacts and holds water against the roots over time. The structure is wrong, not just the drainage rate. Use a real bark-based mix.

How is this different from sphagnum moss alone?

Sphagnum holds way more water than orchid roots want long-term. Pure sphagnum is fine for transplant or recovery, but for ongoing growth, a bark-based mix prevents root rot. This mix has a small amount of sphagnum for humidity, anchored in chunky bark for drainage.

Can I make my own orchid mix?

You can. The trade-off is sourcing the right grade of fir bark (it should be coarse, sized 1/4 to 1/2 inch), pre-soaking it (raw bark is hydrophobic), and dialing in proportions. We did the work so you don't have to.

Is the mix already fertilized?

No synthetic fertilizer. Orchids are light feeders and bark-based mixes hold no nutrient charge. Use a dilute orchid fertilizer (look for "weakly weekly" recommendations, ~1/4 strength balanced fertilizer) during active growth, less in winter dormancy.

How long does the mix last in the pot?

Most home growers can leave Molly's Orchid Mix in place for 1 to 2 years before the bark breaks down enough to need replacing. Annual repotting is the cleanest discipline; signs that it's overdue include musty odor, water sitting at the surface, and visibly broken-down bark.

Can I reuse old orchid mix from a previous repot?

No. Once bark has broken down, it loses its structure and starts retaining water like soil. Always use fresh mix when repotting. Discard the old mix or compost it.

What pot size should I use?

Smaller than feels right. Orchids prefer to be tight in their pots. The new pot should fit the root mass with about 1cm of breathing room around it. Oversized pots hold too much moisture and rot the roots.

Packaged in a heat-sealed resealable bag.

Related guides

For deeper reading: the orchid care rhythm and the complete orchid potting mix guide.

→ Orchid Care guide

→ Best Potting Mix for Orchids: complete guide

Not sure which mix your plant needs?

Take our free 60-second Soil Finder quiz → Diagnose the problem and get the exact Molly's mix and amount for your plant, plus 10% off.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 35422361897

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell can i mix orchid bark with potting soil

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 9 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
I
Verified Purchase
Inksweat
Lexington, US
★★★★★ 1
Sound is fine thus far, but the rest is an exercise in irritation
Style: 7.2 Receiver
I selected this receiver based on spec sheet comparison to other receivers in its general class and price point, as well as reading through ‘professional’ reviews and assessments of various levels of dubiousness. The general specs as far as features and performance were the biggest factor. But there are things that can’t be discovered in ad copy and that are frequently omitted from even the most genuine and considered review. tl;dr: This is a device with an incredible range of functionality that is hidden from the end user by poor documentation practices, and irritating design choices that bury critical menus under unstated tech dependencies. You must have an Android/iPhone capable of running their apps, and a display connected via a video out to get good output from anything but the headphone jack. Thus far the sound output has proven quite satisfactory. It is these other factors that are dragging the rating into the proverbial pit. The display is a bit cheap, and the backlighting across the panel tends to wash things out about half as much as it illuminates. It’s very old tech—but forgivable if the result is better components elsewhere. Still, the display on my mini battery powered air inflator is a crisp full color OLED, so I have my doubts that that is the case here. The biggest problem is the lack of a physical manual. There’s something of a quickstart guide, but when you consider that most of the controls are via the remote and hidden in menu systems and that those menus have a certain opacity to them, it’s not enough information by long shot, especially if you’re not an experiential learner who strongly prefers to dive into the action and see what happens. If you prefer a more studious approach where you don’t even touch a button until you have some idea what it might do, this is going to be more challenging. There are digital manuals. You can get access to the manual via the Yamaha website, or by downloading via an app that exists to serve up Yamaha manuals. This dependence on screens for vital information is grotesque and should be considered unacceptable. There are multiple problems with this approach. One is the assumption the end user is going to have a suitable phone and be comfortable downloading an app and having a manual on a poor screen for reading technical information and diagrams on. I’m also averse to the idea of my manual requiring adequate battery power, and the only touch navigation I find acceptable in a manual is turning a page; for clarity, I mean physically moving a paper page, not tapping or swiping. Call me old fashioned, call me old, but I’ve had failures in these things before. I’ve never had a book fail to work without it being destroyed. Another issue is longevity. I’ve had too many devices outlive the availability of their digital documentation to be on board with that being the only way it is available. An app is also a requirement to get access to bluetooth as an input. Or at least, that is the only way I was able to get it to work, and then only because I decided to see if the “Musiccast” thing was going to get me access to bluetooth. If there is another way, it wasn’t documented, not that the way I found was particularly well documented. There was nothing saying that that was how to get access to bluetooth as an input, only a short sentence saying you had to set the input to bluetooth for it to receive audio over bluetooth—but cycling through inputs via the remote or the dial on the front never reached a bluetooth input until I had set up Musiccast. Musiccast requires a phone with a working wifi radio to connect to it. Once again, this dependence on an app on a phone, and presumption the end user will both have one and be willing to link it up this way is an obscenity. But it’s made worse by having basic labeled functionality hidden behind it, and poorly documented at that. There are at least two separate menu systems, and two means of accessing them. It is possible to access them from the front panel, using a dial, but the interface is incredibly cramped on a tiny display with bad contrast and worse use of space. The other method is using the remote to trigger an overlay on video out, assuming you are using the HDMI out of the receiver to connect to a display. Ultimately, this is required to have full access to to all the settings. The menu on the unit itself is absolutely tiny in what it can do compared to the full functionality of the unit. For example, it is required you access the on screen menu to select which speakers are in use, what kind they are, and whether or not you are wired for Bi-Amp. If you don't set these settings and your setup doesn't match the default setup, you're going to have issues. The app doesn't cover all of this, and for a device that places such heavy emphasis on it's ability to play music, it is very annoying to have to have a display hooked up to have access to critical setup functions--granted, they really want you to buy into their Musiccast eco-system, so much so that the app is only suitable for setting up Musiccast branded speakers. I don't object to having to set things up. While it would be nice if the unit could sense whether or not an output was connected, I realize that with some of those outputs, knowing it is connected isn't sufficient as they might be put to several uses--still, that could be handled with a switch or a system menu on the device itself. There are a few buttons on the front of the receiver, but all but the power button are capacitive buttons, marked in faint white print with poor contrast. I only discovered them when peering at what I had thought was a blank face looking for the “Connect” button called out in the manual to get Musiccast working. These are terrible buttons, and it’s clear the engineers knew it when they made the power button physical. Internet Radio was apparently also locked behind the Musiccast app connection as it didn’t show up as an input until I connected the Musiccast app—again, not documented beyond saying you had to set the input to Internet Radio to use it. Another irritating grievance hidden in menus only accessibly by poking around the on-screen menu, only accessible if you have a display hooked up: Eco mode. In its default state, this will partially shut down after 20 minutes of not processing sound. If hooked up to a display, this will then go to a pass-thru mode, and it will not automatically pick back up again once audio signal is again being sent. For example, you have a console or PC hooked up to HDMI in, and the display hooked up to HDMI out/eArc. If you are using those devices in a video only mode, with no audio signal, whether it's because you paused a game, or simply got lost reading something and the music stopped, after 20 minutes, the audio processing will shut down, there will be a bit of a flicker and a snap as internal routings are switched around, and the unit will no longer output sound. All sound will iinstead be sent to the display as if the receiver didn't exist. This will persist even if you do start sending audio again. It will not turn itself back on even if you swap inputs, though other inputs will work as normal. The only way I've found to get it out of pass-through for that input is power cycling either the receiver or the sending unit. Fortunately this can be changed, unfortunately, you absolutely have to have a display hooked up to access the menus to do so. Overall, the user experience has been underwhelming at best with poor documentation where it exists, an absence of physical documentation, and some terrible choices in terms app dependency. I absolutely hate that I have to use my phone to get access to not just full function but a basic function like being able to pair a bluetooth source to the receiver for playback.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 15, 2025
A
Verified Purchase
Audiophile
Cuba, US
★★★★★ 5
The best amplifier Ive had since my 1985 Yamaha R-7.
Style: 7.2 Receiver
The Yamaha rx-v6a, tsr-700, and yes, the rx-a2a, are all pretty much the same AVR, on the same firmware channel. Same power, same dacs, same dac implementation, same output stages, same construction, they’re the same. The a2a has a 5th foot, and 2 ten thousand micro farad capacitors in the power supply, while the v6a and tsr-700 have 2 eighty-one hundred micro farad capacitors in the power supply, and only 4 feet. These 2 tiny differences make no difference in sound quality or reliability, whatsoever. All three are simply awesome. From the DACS to the amps, and everything in between, these Yamahas sound better and out perform all the others. The HDMI boards have all been updated, and the firmware is mature. To even match these in sound quality and reliability and longevity, you would have to spend many thousands of dollars. Of the rx-v6a, the tsr-700, and the rx-a2a, which ever one is on sale for the least, get that one, because they’re the same device. In this case, that’s a good thing because you’ll love them.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 16, 2025
W
Verified Purchase
Working Dad
Birmingham, US
★★★★★ 5
Yamaha quality, solid audio
Style: 7.2 Receiver
Best in class YAMAHA .... better than DENON or ONKYO in my opinion. DENON and ONKYO both have issues with overheating and then shutting down. Yamaha cruises along on same power level without any hiccups.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 24, 2026
R
Verified Purchase
Robert
Bozeman, US
★★★★★ 5
SOUND - is Amazing, Incredible and better than the movie theater!
Style: AVR-X1800H
Arrived quickly. Setup was easy for for quick start, but to fine tune will take a good deal of effort (fun for me so no issues). OK, SOUND - is amazing, incredible and better than the movie theater! (paired with Klipsch 5.1, but will turn it into a 7.2). Drowns out my neighbors dogs which bark all the time - this system can get loud but the clarity is crisp and clean. Recall 20 years ago this system would have cost $10k plus for everything, now set me back around $1500 for all. But this review is on the receiver and it is superb! Looks brand new, has sufficient warranty and 90-day return option so more than enough time to try and determine for yourself. The price is about $2-300 lower than a new one and every bit as effective so I definitely recommend this product to anyone that wants a very high quality home theater at a super low price point. Entry level to experienced, this receiver should satisfy all.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 20, 2025
S
Verified Purchase
Sean
San Leandro, US
★★★★★ 5
Sound quality
Style: AVR-X1800H
Great sound for home entertainment center and surround sound for watching hd movies
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 1, 2026

recommand products