SKU: 42613020593
rubber tree inside house

rubber tree inside house 130

$18.05 $20.05
Save 10%
No.2 Bestseller on mivipcard.com >

Pay in installments of $5.01 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Sep 25 - Sep 30

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

rubber tree inside house 130Ficus elastica Robusta, commonly known as the Rubber Plant Robusta, is a timeless indoor classic celebrated for its broad, glossy foliage and effortless sophistication. A member of the Moraceae family, this cultivar is native to the tropical forests of Southeast Asia and India, where it grows as a canopy tree reaching impressive heights. The leaves are large, oval, and luxuriously thick with a deep emerald green gloss and a prominent central vein. New

Ficus elastica ‘Robusta’, commonly known as the Rubber Plant ‘Robusta’, is a timeless indoor classic celebrated for its broad, glossy foliage and effortless sophistication. A member of the Moraceae family, this cultivar is native to the tropical forests of Southeast Asia and India, where it grows as a canopy tree reaching impressive heights.

The leaves are large, oval, and luxuriously thick with a deep emerald-green gloss and a prominent central vein. New leaves emerge encased in a striking bronze sheath before unfurling to reveal a smooth, vibrant surface. Compared to other Ficus varieties, ‘Robusta’ is notably hardy and upright, making it perfect for modern interiors where bold greenery meets minimal maintenance.

Architectural, air-purifying, and effortlessly elegant, Ficus elastica ‘Robusta’ is a living design statement — equally at home in a minimalist loft or lush tropical interior.

Ficus elastica ‘Robusta’ – Care Guide

Light

Thrives in bright, indirect light, though it will tolerate moderate light levels. For the richest colour and fastest growth, position near a bright window with filtered sunlight. Avoid harsh direct sun, which can scorch the leaves, and low-light corners, which may slow growth and cause leaf drop.

Watering

Water when the top 3–5 cm of soil feels dry to the touch. Keep the soil lightly moist but not soggy. Overwatering can cause yellowing leaves and root rot, while underwatering may lead to drooping or curling leaves. During winter, reduce watering frequency as the plant’s growth slows.

Temperature and Humidity

  • Temperature: Prefers warmth between 18–28 °C; avoid temperatures below 15 °C.

  • Humidity: Tolerates average indoor humidity (40–60%) but thrives with slightly higher levels. Occasional misting or a humidifier will maintain leaf vitality, especially in heated rooms.

Soil and Potting

Use a well-draining, fertile potting mix, ideally a combination of compost, perlite, and pine bark. This provides airflow to the roots while holding light moisture. Repot every 2–3 years in spring, increasing pot size gradually as the plant matures.

Feeding

Feed every 4–6 weeks during spring and summer with a balanced liquid fertiliser formulated for foliage plants. Avoid fertilising in winter. Regular feeding will encourage lush growth and maintain the deep green leaf colour.

Pruning and Maintenance

Prune to maintain shape and encourage branching. Remove any yellow or damaged leaves near the base. Wipe the leaves with a soft, damp cloth or a natural leaf shine solution to remove dust and enhance their reflective gloss. Rotate periodically for even growth and balanced light exposure.

Growth and Maturity

A moderate to fast grower, Ficus ‘Robusta’ can reach 2–3 metres indoors, forming a strong central trunk and symmetrical canopy. Over time, it develops an elegant, tree-like form that becomes a true focal point. With the right light and humidity, it can produce new leaves consistently throughout the year.

Common Issues

  • Yellow leaves: Overwatering or poor drainage.

  • Dropping leaves: Environmental changes, cold drafts, or underwatering.

  • Dull foliage: Low light or lack of cleaning.

  • Pests: Occasionally mealybugs or scale; treat promptly with neem oil or insecticidal soap.

Background and Benefits

Ficus elastica is native to tropical and subtropical regions of Southeast Asia, including Malaysia and India, where it thrives in warm, humid forests. The ‘Robusta’ cultivar is one of the most popular houseplant selections, valued for its large, glossy leaves and resilient nature.

In addition to its beauty, Ficus elastica ‘Robusta’ is also an excellent natural air purifier, filtering toxins such as formaldehyde and benzene from indoor air. Its upright form and deep green foliage bring structure and calm to modern interiors, offering both visual appeal and tangible health benefits.

Quick Care Summary

Light: Bright, indirect light; tolerates moderate light
Water: Allow top 3–5 cm of soil to dry before watering
Temperature: 18–28 °C; avoid below 15 °C
Humidity: Moderate (40–60%)
Soil: Well-draining mix – compost, perlite, bark
Feed: Every 4–6 weeks in spring/summer
Growth: Upright habit, 2–3 m indoors; large, glossy green leaves with red-tinged new growth

⚠️ Toxicity note: Contains latex sap that may irritate skin and is toxic if ingested. Keep away from pets and children.

Styling Tip

Display Ficus elastica ‘Robusta’ in a modern ceramic or matte concrete planter to highlight its structural form and glossy leaves. Its bold green tones pair beautifully with light walls and natural materials like wood or stone. For a refined tropical arrangement, combine it with silver-leaved plants such as Scindapsus pictus ‘Silver Hero’ or deep reds like Philodendron ‘Rojo Congo’. Ideal for living rooms, hallways, and offices, it adds vertical interest and timeless elegance to any contemporary space.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 42613020593

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell rubber tree inside house

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 30 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
L
Verified Purchase
Lisa S.
New York, US
★★★★★ 5
Nice product
Color: Gold-aa
when having guests over, it's nice for each one to use their own towel instead of having a 'community' guest towel, or those fancy ones that people feel guilty using. This solved the problem.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 7, 2026
A
Verified Purchase
Anonymous B
Natrona Heights, US
★★★★★ 5
Rich
Format: Paperback
A wonderful book that illuminates the reality of the God of Israel compared to the ANE deities.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 28, 2026
F
Verified Purchase
F. Gwin
Louisville, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent. An invaluable resource!
Format: Paperback
Recently I have been reading a lot of books that have told me that the Bible's story of Adam and Eve plus the Exodus etc. are all myths that are extremely similar. Therefore, we should rethink the Bible and change our understanding of it to a more modern worldview that incorporates this knowledge and denies any sort of originality in the biblical account. John Oswalt thinks differently. He thinks that the Genesis story of origins is not some random piece of Semitic or Mesopotamian literature, but that is really unique revelation from God (and is prepared to back that statement up!). The book is divided into two sections: The Bible and Myth The Bible and History Oswalt spends the first few chapters defining the world of the Old Testament and trying to find a definition for the word myth. He comes to the conclusion that a myth "the reflection of a certain way of thinking about the world. To be sure, because of the way in which it thinks, the fantastic is often found in myth. But it is not the presence of the fantastic that makes a piece of literature myth; rather, it is the presence of the mythic worldview." This worldview, he asserts, is based off of what he calls "continuity," which he describes as "when the human, natural, and divine realms are expressed and actualized [together]." The worldview that assumes continuity is based on the here and now, and is very panentheistic. Primordial time is a key factor and the gods are dependent on the humans. This is not so with the biblical worldview. The worldview of the Bible assumes transcendence - an independent God meeting with people on his own terms. He then compares and contrasts these views and shows the real differences between stories like Enimu Elish and Genesis 1. He doesn't deny similarities in the narratives, but he shows the differences in the worldviews. He then moves on to history. Just like the word "myth," Oswalt has to define history, because how civilizations have viewed history in the past has never been the same as Western civilization views history. Then he asks whether or not the Bible is history, and whether or not it matters. He makes several great points here, one of which is that ancient annuals and chronicles never recorded the defeats of kings, yet we find Israel's holy book littered with their failures and mess ups. This is a serious deal when looking at whether or not the Bible is history, because in the ancient way of thinking this surely stands out. He then looks at other questions, like "Are Biblical Faith and Biblical History Inseparable?" and responds to some critics (including Bultmann!). He then looks into the origins of the Israelites' worldview by means of authorship. Is the Bible a late text that was updated from an older, polytheistic one? "No!" says Oswalt. He deals with critiques here as well before moving on to a brilliant conclusion where he sums up the book and gives us a view of how modernism and rationalism are taking us back to the worldview based on continuity. Overall, this was a brilliant book and I wish I had read it sooner!!! It seems like so many authors today are trying to convince us that the Bible has so much in common with the other stories of origin out of an anti-biblical or liberal worldview (like ). However, under close scrutiny these criticisms do not stand up. I thank John for this book, and I will be recommending it to countless others!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 11, 2012
C
Verified Purchase
Cari Ring
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 4
Excellent analysis, decent theorizing
Format: Kindle
While the analysis and argumentation presented in The Bible among the Myths is outstanding, the early chapters of the book suffer from a few problems. First - and this is mainly a complaint given my own preferences - the style of writing in chapters 1-4 differs noticeably from that of the rest of the book. While the introduction and chapters 5-10 reflect a learned, academic style, the first four chapters are written more casually, without quite the same rigor that characterizes most of Oswalt's writing. I am not entirely sure of the reason for this difference, and I wouldn't mention it if it were not for the second issue. These same chapters reflect their writing style in their content, so much so that I nearly gave up on the book after the first three chapters. While I appreciate the author's need to provide background information, definitions, and an overarching theoretical framework, his methodology as laid out in the text is much less rigorous than I would prefer to see. The first few chapters are much less heavily annotated, with fewer scholarly references and a great number of offhanded summaries. He labels his approach to the definition of "myth" as phenomenological, that is, examining the common characteristics of a variety of myths in order to summarize what is essential about them. However, his listings of these common characteristics are vague and poorly related to actual bodies of mythology that survive to the present day. Examples, when cited, are drawn almost exclusively from the Greek and Egyptian traditions. For the understanding of Israelite culture as it relates to its neighbors, this is certainly a fair beginning; for the definition of myth, which is a worldwide phenomenon transcending culture and geography, it seems very far from adequate. As someone who has a thorough knowledge of Christianity and Greco-Roman mythology and at least a nodding acquaintance with Egyptian, Norse/Germanic, and Celtic mythologies, I can at least begin to fill in some of the gaps in Oswalt's analysis. His generalizations, although sweeping, are not particularly problematic, but I am concerned that he embarks upon such a grand theoretical project without doing at least a little more specific analysis of various individual mythologies to demonstrate his points. More problematic in my opinion is that he groups all these various mythologies into a single worldview. Any number of scholars have tried to broaden the interpretations of myths to demonstrate that all cultures revert to the same basic narrative (The Golden Bough being the most famous example, and The Hero with a Thousand Faces being a more recent one); none of them has succeeded particularly well from a scholarly perspective. Despite this early weakness, Oswalt's work undergoes a dramatic improvement starting in chapter 5. His basic point - that the essential view of reality in Israel is demonstrably opposed to the view held by any of its neighbors - can be made without resorting to the sweeping claims of the earlier chapters, and he does an excellent job of presenting and analyzing the evidence for his view. His terminology (of "continuity" and "transcendence"), while not quite adequate to present an overarching definition and theory of what constitutes a myth, is certainly well-suited to his specific analysis. In particular, the analysis of the supposed parallels between the Enuma Elish and Genesis 1 is outstandingly done. After presenting a table with the usual outline of the Enuma Elish against the outline of Genesis 1, he simply proceeds to list the major plot events and how much time it takes to relate each one in the text itself. From this alone, it is readily apparent that the prevailing "outline" has intentionally been generated to encourage comparison to the Genesis account of creation. Such spurious efforts - minimizing the events of over 500 lines of poetry, while selecting 5 which bear questionable similarity to a verse in Genesis - are not honest scholarship, and kudos to Oswalt for pointing this out. I agree with a previous reviewer that it would have been helpful to append the text of the Enuma Elish in parallel with Genesis for readers to compare for themselves would have been a nice touch, but Oswalt's claims are not so elevated that they could not be disproven by direct appeal to the text. One final note. A previous reviewer noted that many of the authors Oswalt discusses wrote between the 60's and 80's, and complained that this made the book seem "dated." I am a graduate student in classics, and can assure those who are concerned that in any field dealing with antiquity, "dated" sources are often some of the most important. Unlike quantum physics, which has less than a century of history, the classic writings of antiquity and the history of those eras has been studied for over two millennia. Meaningful research begins, in fact, with the scholars of Alexandria who worked around 300 BCE; often the work they have done is not duplicated anywhere else. In the field of Ancient Near Eastern studies and Biblical studies in particular, there is likewise a long history of scholarly and interpretive effort. Sources less than a hundred years old are not dated - in the grand scheme of things, they are actually quite recent. It is also worth noting that many of the very recent books, which the reviewer presumably has in mind, are written for a popular audience and would not be considered truly scholarly efforts. Some are written by scholars, but those specific books are unlikely to come up in a serious academic analysis of the subject. The views entertained by those books, however, are very clearly addressed in The Bible among the Myths - largely because the scholarly arguments they were based on are much older than most people assume. Just because Oswalt does not mention names of popular authors does not mean that his argument fails to cover all its bases. All in all, the book is well written and persuasive. The earlier chapters might be found in any popular book on the subject, but the later chapters are more clearly of a scholarly bent, with corresponding vocabulary; readers who are looking for more of a lay approach to the issues may want to look for another author. However, the analysis of parallels between the Old Testament and the surviving Ancient Near Eastern literature is well-presented and balanced, and Oswalt's treatment of other scholars in the field seems to be fair. (I have not read any of their works myself, but Oswalt presents both strengths and weaknesses when considering whether an author's position is sufficiently explanatory and praises some aspects of works he disagrees with. He also is willing to point out when he agrees with some of the author's data, but draws a different conclusion. All of this strikes me as favorable.) The later chapters are thoroughly referenced in endnotes and draw from a variety of sources. Chapters 1-4: 3.5 stars Chapters 5-10: 5 stars Overall: 4.5 stars
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 2, 2014
K
Verified Purchase
KC
Lake Worth, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent resource for defending why Christianity is not rooted in mythology
Format: Paperback
I bought this book as required reading for an introductory Old Testament class I was taking in seminary. Sad to say, the textbook mostly collects dust. To this day, I use Oswalt's book for reference and continue to recommend the reading of it to others. I do not believe one can fully defend the Christian faith without first knowing how firmly convinced some scholars and historians are that Christianity is rooted in mythology. I will not lie. If you read about some of these myths in a silo, you may find yourself leaning toward such false beliefs. When you take a step back and consider the time in history in which the Old Testament was written, the picture becomes more clear. In the introduction to the Old Testament class, we also read Ancient Near Eastern Thought and the Old Testament by John H. Walton. Again, the text book is mostly collecting dust, I also repeatedly use this one as a reference. I would strongly recommend reading both books. The second is more academic in style than the first, but it helps lend further context.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 29, 2015

recommand products

Wonderfold W4 Original Quad Stroller Wagon – S&D Kids
27.21
WonderFold W4 Elite Pro Stroller Wagon (4 Seater) – Lakeland Baby and Teen Furniture
24.99
Sage Green Hammock Baby Swing Safari – Indoor Outdoor Seat
29.24
Macrame Baby Swing | 100% Organic Cotton
23.90
Wonderfold W4 Multifunctional Quad Stroller Wagon, 2021, Sunset Orange
27.17