SKU: 49583574956
succulent vicks plant

succulent vicks plant Shop 'Vicks Plant

$25.31 $28.12
Save 10%
No.2 Bestseller on mivipcard.com >

Pay in installments of $7.03 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 2 - Aug 7

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

succulent vicks plant Shop 'Vicks PlantThe Vicks plant, also known as Plectranthus tomentosa, is a member of the mint family, and Plectranthus genus. It is a popular choice for respiratory health because its leaves contain essential oils that are known for their calming and soothing effects. The Vicks plant has many health benefits in addition to adding beauty to your home's interior design. The Vicks plant gets its common name from the distinct scent: its leaves emit when rubbed or

The Vicks plant, also known as Plectranthus tomentosa, is a member of the mint family, and Plectranthus genus. It is a popular choice for respiratory health because its leaves contain essential oils that are known for their calming and soothing effects. The Vicks plant has many health benefits in addition to adding beauty to your home's interior design. 

The Vicks plant gets its common name from the distinct scent: its leaves emit when rubbed or crushed. The aroma is often described as similar to menthol or Vicks Vapor Rub, hence the name.

This delightful scent makes it a popular choice for aromatic gardens or as a natural air freshener indoors.

The Vicks plant has several other names such as Succulent Coleus, Cuban Oregano, Vicks vapor rub, and Plectranthus hadiensis var. tomentosus.

Native to South Africa, the Vicks plant has velvety, soft, fuzzy vibrant green leaves that are opposite and broadly ovate with scalloped margins, and densely hairy. This beautiful Vicks plant is known for the minty, camphor fragrance of its leaves. This whole plant itself is relatively compact and can grow up to 1 foot tall and 2.5 feet wide, making it suitable for both indoor and outdoor cultivation. With age, the lower stems can become extremely woody.  

The Vicks plant's flowers are small, white to pale purple, or produce large quantities of lavender blooms. Its blooming season typically appears in early spring and again in fall and can last for several weeks. The growth rate of this Vicks plant is fast. 

When and How to Water Your Vicks Plant 

When it comes to watering the Vicks plant, it's important to strike a balance. This lovely Plectranthus prefers to be kept moderately moist, but not overly saturated. Aim to water it when the top inch of the soil feels dry to the touch. Be cautious not to let the soil dry out completely, as this can cause stress to your Vicks plant. 

On the other hand, excessive watering can cause root rot. It's always a good idea to check the moisture level of the soil before watering to ensure you're providing just the right amount of hydration.

In the spring and summer, during the growing season, Vicks plants typically require watering once a week, ensuring the soil is moist but not waterlogged. In the winter, during the dormant season, reduce watering frequency to every 2-3 weeks to prevent root rot.

Light Requirements - Where to Place Your Vicks Plant

For indoor growing, Vicks plants require bright, indirect sunlight for at least 6-8 hours a day. It is important to place them near a window where they can receive adequate light without being exposed to direct sunlight, as this can cause the leaves to burn.

When grown outdoors, Vicks plant needs Full sun to partial shade for at least 4-6 hours daily. It enjoys basking in the gentle rays of the sun but be sure to shield it from direct sunlight for over 6 hours, as it can scorch its delicate velvety leaves.

It is best to provide them with a sheltered spot that receives dappled sunlight throughout the day for optimal growth and health.

If you notice the leaves starting to stretch or become pale, it might be an indication that it needs more light. So, let the Vicks plant soak up that sunshine, but remember to protect it from the harsh rays! 

Optimal Soil & Fertilizer Needs 

The Vicks plant needs well-drained organic-rich soil to germinate. Your soil must have a sandy texture and a low water-holding capacity, just like desert soil.  Soggy wet soil can damage your succulents and contribute to bacterial and fungal rot. Ideally, you want to use our specialized succulent potting mix that contains 5 natural substrates and organic mycorrhizae to promote the development of a strong root system that helps your succulent to thrive.   

As for fertilizer, natural fertilizers with an equal mix of NPK (5-10-5) are the best choice as they last longer and keep your soil alive by adding other beneficial compounds and microbes that encourage Vick's plant health and nutrient absorption. So, skip those harsh chemicals and give your succulent coleus some love with a good natural fertilizer! 

Hardiness Zone & More 

When growing indoors, the Vicks plants are best done in temperatures ranging from 65-75°F with high humidity levels. To mimic these conditions indoors, consider using a humidifier or placing the plant on a tray filled with water and pebbles.

For outdoor cultivation, ensure they are planted in hardiness zones 9-11, where temperatures do not drop below 30°F. Additionally, provide ample sunlight and well-draining soil to promote healthy growth.  After a year or more of growth, the plants become woodier at the base and are more resistant to frost damage. 

In terms of humidity, the Vicks plant enjoys moderate to high humidity levels. You can increase humidity by misting the leaves or placing a tray of water nearby. So, keep your favorite plant cozy in its preferred temperature range and provide it with some humidity, and it'll be happy and healthy! 

Wildlife - Vicks Plant Attracts the Following Friendly Pollinators

The Vicks plant is known to attract a variety of friendly pollinators such as bees, butterflies, and hummingbirds with its fragrant flowers and nectar-rich blooms. These pollinators play a crucial role in the plant's reproduction process by transferring pollen from one flower to another, ultimately leading to the production of seeds.

Butterflies
Bees
Hummingbirds
Lady Bugs
Multi Pollinators
Other Birds

How to Propagate Your Vicks Plant

To propagate a Vicks plant, you can take stem cuttings from a healthy, mature plant. Make sure the cutting is at least 4-6 inches long and has several leaves. Remove the lower leaves and dip the cut end in rooting hormone before planting it in a well-draining potting mix. Keep the cutting in a warm, humid environment and water it regularly until roots develop.

Key Takeaways

  1. The Vicks plant has thick, fuzzy leaves that emit a soothing, minty scent when touched or crushed, similar to menthol vapor.
  2. This plant is hardy in dry conditions and requires minimal watering, making it an ideal choice for drought-prone areas or low-maintenance gardens.
  3. During warmer months, it produces small, tubular lavender or pale purple flowers, adding a delicate aesthetic contrast to its lush green leaves.
  4. The Vicks plant thrives both indoors in bright, indirect light and outdoors in mild climates, particularly in USDA zones 9-11.
  5. It propagates easily through cuttings, making it simple to expand your collection or share with others.

The Bottom Line

Overall, the Vicks plant (Plectranthus tomentosa) is a unique houseplant with fuzzy leaves that release a menthol-like scent when touched. To care for this plant, make sure it receives bright, indirect light and water it when the top inch of soil feels dry. Additionally, occasional pruning can help maintain its compact shape and promote healthy growth. The Vicks plant is a great addition to a variety of settings.  It is an absolute necessity for plant lovers who enjoy hanging baskets.  

Don't miss out on this opportunity to add something truly exceptional to your garden. Order your very own Vicks Plant - Plectranthus tomentosa today! 

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 49583574956

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell succulent vicks plant

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.0 ★★★★★
Based on 29 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
G
Verified Purchase
GiveHerAGoodMunchin
Charlottesville, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent trilogy. This is book 2
Format: Paperback
Bob Monroe is an OG OBE G. Love this trilogy. If you can read, read this
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 25, 2025
J
Verified Purchase
Joe Neal
Cuba, US
★★★★★ 5
Great (excellent) details for the date written
Format: Paperback
NOTE: I toned this version down in 2021 – I was in a bad place when I wrote the original and there were some hostile and entirely inaccurate personal remarks in it. A few tables/charts with a wealth of information have tiny text but most of this was easy enough to read. The photos are poorly produced (at least in the paperback version I reviewed), which is sad given they would be so handy otherwise. This is a classic post-war treatise on the weapons used for ground warfare during World War II by the U.S. Army and as such the Marines. It was first published around 1947 when the war was fresh and doubtlessly numerous technical details were still classified. It was written by a man intimately involved in many design projects. The coverage pretty much explains the breadth. Examples of use are included for some weapons and detailed tables of data for many. He explains references to the "long primer" for the 76-mm gun and the 81-mm mortar T1 extension tube. I am happy to have bought it for that and numerous other details. One thing I missed when I first wrote the original rambling, a bit over the top review back in September 2015 was that the 57mm M1 antitank gun is not mentioned even though it was a key component of Infantry weaponry in 1944-45, sometimes maligned but often quite effective when carefully used as noted in many, many detailed accounts. Perhaps it was skipped because it was a revision of the British 6 pounder and not designed by Barnes men? Yet, it is an example of the issues caused by the pre war budget minders forcing the Army into desperate choices as explained later – and the using arms who decided to adopt it almost at the last minute, late in 1943. Until a weapon is adopted by the Army ammunition cannot be developed – it costs too much money and time to do so. Most of the book is positive and ignores failures, posed from the viewpoint of a proud designer not an actual user. Yet those failures illustrate the issues Ordnance had to deal with during the war. The U.S. invented the bazooka as the 2.36-inch model in 1942 yet the Germans fielded the more powerful 8.8-cm (88mm) model in 1944; and the U.S. did not get the 3.5-inch (90mm) into production-ready state until the war was ended. This was caused by offloading development onto people who went out for a “super rocket launcher” that had no place in the war. All too often, some excited designers did indeed get ahead of themselves when it came to what worked but was a bit too much (and ultimately impractical for the Army at the time). The inability to develop hollow-charge (HEAT) ammo for cannon and howitzers to reach its minimum potential (twice the caliber in penetration or better) was common for all countries including the U.S. The 105mm howitzer round was pretty good and while disparaged by all and sundry even the 75mm howitzer’s shell could (and did) take out medium armor. Barnes refers to the M3 and M5 light tank as "excellent" when the tanker's epithet would have been "tin plated coffin with a pea-shooter". Here we have an issue with comparing numbers such as armor thickness and penetration power of guns to facts; it is common to think they were butchered such as in Africa when in fact they fought well enough, flaws and all. But they were not the weapons the tankers wanted (nor deserved), and thus tanker’s complaints were valid. And, yes, they were not seen as a prime resource for fighting German tanks and hence reverted to recon and infantry support roles. Where they continued to meet and destroy German armor (but also be destroyed). Any German field commander would have loved to have a battalion of M5s on hand chasing down and chewing up U.S. troops; the contribution of the men in the light tanks in Europe in 1944 and 1945 is all too often belittled by the “number nerds” who toss the light tanks off as useless. They were anything but useless. Why were the M10, M18, and M36 designed as “Gun Motor Carriages” and not tanks? Because they were developed for the tank destroyer forces and the very bigoted officers who held the most sway on development wanted them to be nothing but “motorized antitank guns”. If they had been designed as tanks that would have invalidated Tank Destroyer Doctrine immediately. And yet, in the end, the men doing the fighting needed and wanted tanks, so they used them as tanks as much as they could, despite the open roof and lack of internal machine guns. It is claimed the gun motor carriages were cheaper than tanks (a specious argument given price varied by manufacturer and ultimately depended more on quantities produced not some arbitrary raw number) but to produce the gun motor carriages for a specialist role that was neither tank nor artillery (albeit they were used for both) was a costly thing to do. The failure to develop a better light tank in time is not mentioned even though the T7 light tank with a 57-mm gun was ready in mid-1942 and could have been in the field around 1943 (the Armored Forces botched that one). The M24 was a nice tank but too late simply because development came too late because development had been stunted badly by congress and it’s miserly pre-1941 budget. There are errors: The design of the M24 began in 1943, not 1945. The 76-mm gun could hardly penetrate the "...heaviest German tank armor." But it could penetrate a lot of armor and the myth that all German tanks were Tigers and Panthers is one of those fantasies of the war pursued by people who are glorifying the war not understanding it (most German armor was medium or lighter), let alone the myth that they were always met head-on is ridiculous. The 90-mm gun was not optimized for anti-tank use and hence had the same issues with dealing with the frontal armor of the Panther (though it could handle the Tiger) and yet was better at that than many other guns. The tendency to adapt anti-aircraft guns for anti-tank guns was common and is where Germany got its 88s and the 128mm. The U.S. found it did not need a lot of 90mms (the homeland was not threatened and what it produced was enough for its needs); there was never the demand for a higher altitude version and hence nothing like the 8.8cm FLAK 41 was developed which led to the 8.8cm Kwk43 and Pak43s; yet Ordnance built their own versions of hot 90mm for tank use. I missed the boat in my original review failing to detail how the Army’s main issue was the budget provided by Congress and politicians from 1920 through 1940. They starved the Army; the U.S. was peaceful and they had no interest in making it a military country and as such kept the Army small (and starved the air forces and Navy as well but not as badly). This crippled development; while the Soviets started building a modern Army in 1930 complete with investment in tank forces and tank arsenals; the Germans in 1934 or so; and British in 1934 or so; the U.S. politicians did not begin serious spending on the Army until 1941. Before then, the budget was all about “beans, bullets, and bayonets” and of course bodes to wield them. The Army had to struggle with what it had and put to field what was practical not what was best. Thus, for example, the recoilless rifles (used by the Germans in 1940) did not arrive in U.S. use until 1945. And yet a U.S. officer bult the first recoilless rifle to be used way back around 1916. Indeed, a brief little discussion on how the U.S. produced what it did based on budget would have opened many eyes. The Soviets produced so many thousand T34s for example, more than the U.S. – and in the U.S. the budget people were always saying, “You don’t need any more, stop building them!” As mentioned, the number of 90mm AA guns the U.S. produced was not based on manufacturing capacity but because they didn’t need more. Thus - there is a lot of information and many details many people will never have heard before. There are also many missing details concerning the Ordnance Department struggles to get things done in a very brief time frame thanks to how Congress had refused to let them do anything earlier. Dig into that deeper and you might find it nauseating the way people played games that hindered the U.S. Army in its job of helping beat the Germans. And sometimes couldn't put 2 and 2 together to get the right answer. But, they were human after all, and people do make mistakes. In my original review I argued that “If you want a politics free book you will not get it in this once, not unless you shut your eyes and remain ignorant . . .” but that is wrong. If this was a political book, Barnes might have ripped the budget mongers of the 1920s and 1930s a new sphincter for leaving the Army (and U.S. military as a whole) in such a bad situation as they did when war broke out. But, Barnes had more class than I do.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 19, 2015
P
Verified Purchase
Petey K
Birmingham, US
★★★★★ 5
Good content, very small print and photos
Format: Paperback
Get a magnifying glass… the print is tiny. They must have made this book to be a large hard cover because both the print and the photos are so small in paperback. Content looks decent. It’s a gift for my grandson who will probably spend more time with the photos than the reading anyway and his eyesight is better than mine. :D
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 16, 2025
M
Verified Purchase
Museum Man
Charlottesville, US
★★★★★ 4
Printing not up to standards.
Format: Paperback
Printing and pics not up to par.I gifted this book to a coworker and he was not as picky as I.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 8, 2020
T
Verified Purchase
TDD
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent resource
Format: Paperback
Purchased for my teenage son's history research project. Nice compilation, good information and well illustrated.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 29, 2025

recommand products

Monterey Remuda Full Strength (41% Glyphosate)
28.53
Snapshot 2.5 TG Specialty Herbicide – Granular Preemergent
27.78
Master MFG SSBK-620 Sprayer Boom Kit,Silver,60 psi,10 ft
26.69
Nufarm - 4 Speed XT
22.73
Stomp Herbicide FMC 455CS Pendimethalin 500ml Weedicide – IR Farm
23.77