Pay in installments of $7.47 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Sep 2 - Sep 7
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
insecticidal soap vegetable garden Safer Insecticidal Soap Concentrate (Pint)Safer Brand Insecticidal Soap Concentrate offers a powerful, eco friendly solution for controlling soft bodied insects in your organic garden. This pint sized insect killing soap concentrate dilutes to create up to 6 gallons of effective insecticidal soap spray, perfect for vegetables, fruits, flowers, shrubs, and indoor plants. Formulated with potassium salts of fatty acids as the active ingredient, this product kills insects on contact by breaking
Safer Brand® Insecticidal Soap Concentrate offers a powerful, eco-friendly solution for controlling soft bodied insects in your organic garden. This pint-sized insect killing soap concentrate dilutes to create up to 6 gallons of effective insecticidal soap spray, perfect for vegetables, fruits, flowers, shrubs, and indoor plants.
Formulated with potassium salts of fatty acids as the active ingredient, this product kills insects on contact by breaking down their protective outer layers. It effectively controls common insect pests, including aphids, mealybugs, whiteflies, and spider mites—all while sparing beneficial insects such as ladybugs and lacewings.
Key Features
-
Concentrated Formula
One pint of concentrate makes up to 6 gallons of spray, ideal for use with a spray bottle or garden sprayer. -
Kills Insects on Contact
Quickly disrupts the cell membranes of soft bodied insects like aphids, whiteflies, mealybugs, thrips, and spider mites for fast pest control. -
Safe for Beneficial Insects
Supports natural pest control by sparing beneficial insects, allowing them to thrive in your garden ecosystem. -
OMRI Listed & Organic Garden Safe
Approved for organic production and safe to use on edible plants up to the day of harvest. -
Versatile Use
Suitable for houseplants, sweet peas, vegetables, flowers, trees, and shrubs in both indoor and outdoor settings. -
Eco-Friendly & Biodegradable
Breaks down within 7–10 days, leaving no harmful residues—ideal for sustainable pest control. -
Insecticidal Soap RTU Available
For added convenience, a ready-to-use (RTU) insecticidal soap spray option is also available for immediate application without mixing.
Usage Tips
-
Application Timing
Spray in the early morning or late afternoon to minimize plant stress and maximize effectiveness. Avoid applying when temperatures exceed 90°F. -
Repeat Applications
Because insecticidal soaps work on contact, multiple treatments may be necessary to fully control heavy infestations. -
Mixing Instructions
Follow label directions carefully when diluting the concentrate. Use a spray bottle or garden sprayer for thorough coverage. -
Storage & Stability
Once diluted, use the spray within 24 hours for best results. -
Safe, Natural Alternative
Ideal for gardeners preferring an alternative to homemade insecticidal soap or harsher chemical pesticides.
Where to Use
-
Insect Soap for Aphids & More
Controls a broad range of pests, especially aphids, whiteflies, and mites. -
Indoor & Outdoor Gardens
Effective on houseplants, vegetable patches, flower beds, and ornamental shrubs. -
Edible Plants Protection
Safe to spray on fruits and vegetables up to the day of harvest, providing worry-free pest control.
Whether you’re managing aphids on sweet peas, spider mites on tomatoes, or whiteflies on ornamentals, Safer Brand® Insecticidal Soap Concentrate delivers reliable, safe pest control without compromising beneficial insect populations or your garden’s health.
Explore more effective, eco-friendly solutions in our Natural & Organic Pesticides Collection.
For all your other pest control needs explore our collections here.
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.3 ★★★★★
Based on 21 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 4
Septuagint LXX Codex Alexandrinus finally in English!
Format: Hardcover
This is the overall accurate and most complete collection of books of the original covenant scriptures, (the Old Testament.) For the average English reader who doesnt know or care much to learn the spiritual gems of the bible through the languages of modern Hebrew and Ancient pictoral Hebrew, this will be your best version of the O. T. to have by far! Its all in English, translated out of the LXX, Codex Alexandrinus, which is the most ancient and most accurate septuagint text available so far, despite what modern scholars and pastors are wrongly telling you. Why the hell does every church have colies of the NIV Nearly Inspired version, for everyone to use, when they could buy this along with the Greek- English Interlinear N.T with NKJV along the side as well!?? Many scholars will say that the LXX V or Codex Vaticanus is dated earlier and is therfore more accurate but that is not completely true. It is still another great version to use also, as found in Brentons English version and the amazing Apostolic Bible Polyglot but it is still a translation made later in time from out of the Masoretic Hebrew Text. But this NETS version of the septuagint is from the original source Greek O.T. which was made originally around 250 B.C and was made out of Ezras authentic and most accurate Hebrew copy of the Tanakh or O.T., given to him directly by God again, when he was in Babylon. (See 4 Esdras 14 in the Good News Bible with deuterocanonicals/Apochrypha! $8 FROM AMAZON, of which I also did a brief review of a while ago!)You will get the most out of this version of the O.T set of scriptures. But don't forget to also get the other missing scriptures and restore many other lost and forgotten books, and verses of scripture like 4th Esdras, 1st and 2nd Adam and Eve, Jasher and 1st and 2nd Enoch, and the testament of the twelve patriarchs! Plus you will need a separate Set of the Renewed Covent scriptures or (the N.T.) because this bound package of scriptures does still not contain the whole counsel of God. There is no New testament in here in case you were wondering. But this version is still the closest to having the most of Gods words, than any other English O.T version in one bound package, that I have found and this is more accurate in more places than not. But there are a few errors still from the Greek, which get carried over into English, like Genesis 4:26 of which the Aramaic versions, and Hebrew Masoretic text and Jasher have, when the letters are respaced correctly. This verse should tell us that Enosh profaned the name of God, not worshiped or called upon or hoped to call upon God. Some of the Greek text's flaws in which the Hebrew M.T. is superior are: Zechariah 5:1- 2, 12:10 and Genesis 1:1 (of which the Aleph and Tav is present and is unjustly left out and equals The Messiah/God, as in Revelation 1:8!) And psalm 138:2 to name a few. But over all without other deeper study, the Greek O.T. text has more to offer as a whole than the Hebrew version left preserved for us. And there is no finished English translation and bound book yet, of the Aramaic Targumim O.T. TIthat will be the next masterpiece, when someone gets it done. It is still being worked on. See Andrew Gabriel Roth's Aramaic Eastern Peshitta N.T. as well as David Bausher's western peshitta N. T. Interlinear pr plain English. Hopefully one of these guys or both will do the correct smd more co ete Aramaic Targumim for the O. T. and not he later made syriac translation but we will ha e ro wait and see.?
Also, some verses in which the LXX is superior over the late made Hebrew M.T. are found in verses like Genesis 11:13- 14, which are missing completely from the Hebrew!!! See Luke 3:36 to verify Kainan or Caianan's existence in the genealogical bible lineage of the Patriarchs! Cainan's existence also makrs creation 565 years earlier then 4004 bc that bishop Ussher wrongly dated from the Hebrew Masoretic Text. And see Ezekiel 21:3- which shows God only killing the unrighteous in the two LXX versions and never the righteous with the wicked, like Abraham pleaded with God in Genesis 18:23. Sadly the late Masoretic Hebrew Text erroneously has God killing both the righteous with the unrighteous! Also see DANIEL 12:4 in this LXX, which has a superior English translation, even though the same better meaning is hidden in the Hebrew. This verse should say the knowledge of evil and cunning to harm us, will increase, not the knowledge of the gospel or technology increasing, like many commentators have said.. Also DANIEL 12:4 should be translated as saying that many people will run away in apostasy and violent madness, not just running to and fro!?? Any serious students can contact me at AnswersInGenesis at live dot com. Every disciplined learned who wishes to mature, needs a copy of this and should read this as their main version of the Tanakh or O.T. I will also be happy to further translate and teach this along with the Hebrew Masoretic Text and both Aramaic Targumim to serious literal minded people, as I am already doing chronologically, through the whole bible, in my own bible study in Tucson on Shabbat (friday) evenings. Enjoy!😊
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 7, 2016
★★★★★ 5
A very well made book
Format: Hardcover
Just anecdotally, I've found that often when the NETS diverges from the Masoretic text it aligns with the Douay translation of the Vulgate. For example, LXX Psalm 42,4 in the NETS renders it:
"to God who makes glad my youth"
Douay has:
"to God who giveth joy to my youth"
Whereas JPS Tanakh has:
"unto God, my exceeding joy."
The Douay has the Latin book names so none of the frankly weird faux Greek spellings. And the Douay is more poetic. Brenton is more poetic for that matter.
The point is if you're looking at buying the NETS just know that Brenton and Douay did it hundreds of years ago only better (IMHO) and those books are public domain.
Do buy this book if you 1. can't be bothered to learn Greek and 2. prefer a mutilated NRSV over a little legwork learning how the LXX differs from the Masoretic text.
On the other hand, it's sewn bound, compact, sleek and convenient. It opens flat and has a pleasing font. It's nice to consult when Liddell & Scott fail.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 26, 2024
★★★★★ 5
Very Nice
Format: Hardcover
Bought this as a gift for my father. He loved it. The book is really great for deep dive into the Bible history and origins. Highly recommend for people already familiar with the Bible and want to learn more. My dad said it was easy to understand.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 14, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Their is one God and he loves you!
Format: Hardcover, Format: Hardcover
This is a great translation of the Septuagint translated from Greek to English. A great buy for anyone wanting to read , study or gain more understanding of the Bible.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 11, 2025
★★★★★ 5
A careful, scholarly work
Format: Hardcover
The introduction to this book does a great job of laying out the challenges of translating an ancient translation. It is not, however, aimed at people without a significant background in Hebrew, Greek and translation theory.
I give credit to the authors of the introduction, Albert Pietersma and Benjamin G. Wright, for specifying the nature of the translation and its audience. Taken from Nida and Taber, _The Theory and Practice of Translation_ (Leiden: Brill, 1982), p. 31: "a translation in the present-day literary language, so as to communicate to the well-educated constituency." The translators chose this group "on the assumption that it is most probably this audience that has a more than passing interest in traditions of biblical literature other than their own" (p. xiv). I think they are right about this.
"Translating an ancient text can only be described as a profoundly difficult undertaking....
"The difficulties of the undertaking are certainly not decreased when one attempts to translate an ancient translation into a modern language. If translating is an act of interpreting, as linguists suggest it is, rather than a simple transfer of meaning, a Greek interpretation of a Hebrew original can be expected to reflect what the translator understood the Hebrew text to mean. The end result is therefore inevitably to some degree a commentary written at a specific historical time and place by an individual person, whose understanding of the Hebrew will often have been at variance with our own, though at times perhaps equally viable." (p. xvi)
Indeed, back when I was a linguist- and translator-in-training at the Summer Institute of Linguistics (early 1980s), I was taught the rather simplistic model of translation as a mere transfer of meaning. Experience, though, has taught me that this is virtually impossible. A text of any level of sophistication above that of a stop sign is full of cultural assumptions, lexical polysemy, syntactic ambiguity, and so forth. Any translation is perforce an interpretation. The only way to even begin to compensate for this, if the readers of the translations are not scholars trained in the relevant fields, is to include a massive set of footnotes. The average reader is just not going to take the time to read such a set of notes, even if they are included. The majority of traditional religious readers of a Bible translation are not prepared to deal with the challenges that such footnotes would present to their existing understanding of the text.
The New English Translation of the Septuagint is aimed at those who already have at least some of the relevant scholarly background and are not averse to acquiring more.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 8, 2019