SKU: 72887136387
heart leaf succulent

heart leaf succulent String of Hearts Plant – Ceropegia woodii 4" Pot

Sale price$20.03 Regular price$22.25
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $5.56 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 8 - Aug 13

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

heart leaf succulent String of Hearts Plant – Ceropegia woodii 4" PotIntroducing the string of hearts, known as Ceropegia woodii, which is a charming trailing succulent that belongs to the CeropegiaGo to search results page? q=ceropegia genus. The string of hearts plant has several other common names such as sweetheart vine, rosary vine, line of hearts, and chain of hearts. These names reflect the unique appearance of its leaves and growth habit. Native to South Africa, the string of hearts plant can be found in the

Introducing the string of hearts, known as Ceropegia woodii, which is a charming trailing succulent that belongs to the CeropegiaGo to search-results-page?q=ceropegia genus. The string of hearts plant has several other common names such as sweetheart vine, rosary vine, line of hearts, and chain of hearts. These names reflect the unique appearance of its leaves and growth habit. 

Native to South Africa, the string of hearts plant can be found in the drier regions of the country. It's well-adapted to survive in arid conditions, making it a great choice for those who may forget to water their plants from time to time.  


The name "string of hearts" comes from the shape and arrangement of its leaves.

This chain of heart plants features heart-shaped, fleshy, gray-green foliage with a striking marbled pattern and thin, string-like vines with a distinctive purple shade, which can be enhanced by periodic pruning.

The string of hearts plant is easy to care for, especially during warmer months, and can grow up to 12 feet long, making it a lovely addition to hanging baskets or trailing over shelves.

However, it goes dormant in cooler weather, slowing its growth. 

The string of hearts flowers are small and tubular, with shades of pink and purple. They have an interesting mechanism to attract pollinators - small hairs inside the flower trap insects, which then have to crawl out through a small opening, ensuring they carry pollen with them. 

For string of hearts propagation, you can propagate it through stem cuttings by snipping off a healthy stem and placing it in well-draining soil. The cuttings root easily and can develop into new plants within a few weeks. It's a fun and rewarding way to expand your collection or share the plant with friends. 

Although the string of hearts is most commonly grown as a houseplant, it can also be grown as a sprawling ground cover, in rock gardens, or tumbling down walls in warm Mediterranean climates. 

Additionally, its variegated variety, which is known as a variegated string of hearts is a unique plant with leaves in cream or white, alongside the usual silver-green color. This plant adds visual interest to any space and is highly sought after by plant enthusiasts. 

Watering Needs 

When it comes to watering your string of hearts plant, it's important to find the right balance. You don't want to overwater or underwater your chain of heart plant. When watering, give it a thorough soak, allowing the water to flow through the drainage holes. Then, let the top inch or so of the soil dry out before watering again. It's better to underwater than overwater, as the plant is more tolerant of dry conditions. 

In the spring and summer, during the growing season, the string of hearts plant may need more frequent watering. As the weather cools down in fall and winter, you can reduce the watering frequency. Remember, it's always best to check the soil moisture level before watering to avoid overdoing it. 

Additionally, keep an eye on the leaves. If they start to look wrinkled or droopy, it's a sign that the plant is thirsty. On the other hand, if the leaves turn yellow or feel mushy, it may be a sign of overwatering. Adjust your watering routine accordingly. 

Light Requirements 

When growing indoors, the string of hearts plant prefers bright, indirect light. It thrives in a spot with plenty of bright, filtered sunlight. You can place it near a north or east-facing window where it can receive gentle morning or afternoon sunlight. Avoid placing it in direct sunlight as it can scorch the delicate leaves. 

If you don't have a well-lit spot indoors, you can also grow a string of hearts under fluorescent lights. Position the lights about 6-12 inches above the plant and keep them on for about 12-14 hours a day. 

If you are growing them outdoors, your string of hearts can handle some direct sunlight, especially during the morning or late afternoon. However, it's still best to provide it with some shade during the hottest parts of the day to prevent leaf burn. A partially shaded area with dappled sunlight is ideal. You can place it on a patio, balcony, or in a garden where it can receive bright, indirect light. Just make sure to protect it from strong winds and extreme temperatures. 

Remember, the string of hearts is a versatile plant that can adapt to different light conditions, but it generally prefers bright, indirect light. Keep an eye on your plant's leaves—if they start to look pale or bleached, they may be getting too much light, and if they become dark green, they may need more light.  

Optimal Soil & Fertilizer Needs 

The string of hearts plant prefers sandy, well-drained soil, as excess moisture can promote root and stem rot. Planet Desert specializes in succulents and has specialized succulent potting soil that includes an organic substrate with mycorrhizae to help with the growth of a healthy root system to help your succulents thrive. As an okay alternative, you can create your own potting mix by combining equal portions of perlite, coarse sand, and good natural potting soil. 

When it comes to fertilizing your string of hearts, it doesn't require a lot of nutrients. During the growing season, typically spring, you can feed it with a balanced (5-10-5), water-soluble NPK fertilizer diluted to half the recommended strength. Apply the fertilizer once a year to provide a gentle boost of nutrients. However, during the dormant period in fall and winter, you can reduce or even stop fertilizing altogether. The string of hearts doesn't require as much energy during this time, so it's best to let it rest. 

Remember, it's important not to over-fertilize your Ceropegia woodii, as this can lead to salt buildup in the soil, which can be harmful. Always follow the instructions on the fertilizer packaging and err on the side of caution. 

Hardiness Zones & More 

When growing indoors, the string of hearts plant thrives in average room temperatures ranging from 60°F to 75°F. It's important to keep it away from drafts and extreme temperature fluctuations. The string of hearts plant prefers moderate humidity levels, but it can tolerate lower humidity as well. You can provide a slightly more humid environment by misting the leaves occasionally or placing a tray with water near the plant. However, it's not a high-maintenance plant when it comes to humidity. 

For outdoor cultivation, your Ceropegia woodii string of hearts plant is generally suited for USDA zones 10 to 12, which are characterized by mild to warm climates. These zones typically have minimum average temperatures ranging from 30°F to 60°F. 

If you live in a colder climate, you can still enjoy the string of hearts as an outdoor plant during the warm summer months. However, it's important to bring it indoors or provide protection when temperatures drop below its tolerance level. 

RELATED ARTICLE: 

For full care instructions - Please See our article - String of Hearts Plant ‘How to Care and Grow’ for more details on how to take care of and discover interesting characteristics. 

Final Thoughts 

Overall, the string of hearts plant (Ceropegia woodie) is a delightful trailing succulent with heart-shaped leaves that cascade beautifully from long stems. It's native to South Africa and can tolerate drier conditions. With its tubular flowers and easy propagation, it's a popular choice for plant lovers. As for care, it prefers bright indirect light, well-draining soil, and moderate watering. Just remember not to overwater it. Additionally, the string of hearts plant is a low-maintenance and visually appealing addition to any plant collection.  

Be sure to add a string of hearts plant to your home or garden and enjoy its low maintenance care, while admiring its impressive display year after year. 

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 72887136387

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell heart leaf succulent

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 9 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
A
Verified Purchase
Anonymous B
Dallas, US
★★★★★ 5
Rich
Format: Paperback
A wonderful book that illuminates the reality of the God of Israel compared to the ANE deities.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 28, 2026
F
Verified Purchase
F. Gwin
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent. An invaluable resource!
Format: Paperback
Recently I have been reading a lot of books that have told me that the Bible's story of Adam and Eve plus the Exodus etc. are all myths that are extremely similar. Therefore, we should rethink the Bible and change our understanding of it to a more modern worldview that incorporates this knowledge and denies any sort of originality in the biblical account. John Oswalt thinks differently. He thinks that the Genesis story of origins is not some random piece of Semitic or Mesopotamian literature, but that is really unique revelation from God (and is prepared to back that statement up!). The book is divided into two sections: The Bible and Myth The Bible and History Oswalt spends the first few chapters defining the world of the Old Testament and trying to find a definition for the word myth. He comes to the conclusion that a myth "the reflection of a certain way of thinking about the world. To be sure, because of the way in which it thinks, the fantastic is often found in myth. But it is not the presence of the fantastic that makes a piece of literature myth; rather, it is the presence of the mythic worldview." This worldview, he asserts, is based off of what he calls "continuity," which he describes as "when the human, natural, and divine realms are expressed and actualized [together]." The worldview that assumes continuity is based on the here and now, and is very panentheistic. Primordial time is a key factor and the gods are dependent on the humans. This is not so with the biblical worldview. The worldview of the Bible assumes transcendence - an independent God meeting with people on his own terms. He then compares and contrasts these views and shows the real differences between stories like Enimu Elish and Genesis 1. He doesn't deny similarities in the narratives, but he shows the differences in the worldviews. He then moves on to history. Just like the word "myth," Oswalt has to define history, because how civilizations have viewed history in the past has never been the same as Western civilization views history. Then he asks whether or not the Bible is history, and whether or not it matters. He makes several great points here, one of which is that ancient annuals and chronicles never recorded the defeats of kings, yet we find Israel's holy book littered with their failures and mess ups. This is a serious deal when looking at whether or not the Bible is history, because in the ancient way of thinking this surely stands out. He then looks at other questions, like "Are Biblical Faith and Biblical History Inseparable?" and responds to some critics (including Bultmann!). He then looks into the origins of the Israelites' worldview by means of authorship. Is the Bible a late text that was updated from an older, polytheistic one? "No!" says Oswalt. He deals with critiques here as well before moving on to a brilliant conclusion where he sums up the book and gives us a view of how modernism and rationalism are taking us back to the worldview based on continuity. Overall, this was a brilliant book and I wish I had read it sooner!!! It seems like so many authors today are trying to convince us that the Bible has so much in common with the other stories of origin out of an anti-biblical or liberal worldview (like ). However, under close scrutiny these criticisms do not stand up. I thank John for this book, and I will be recommending it to countless others!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 11, 2012
C
Verified Purchase
Cari Ring
Alexandria, US
★★★★★ 4
Excellent analysis, decent theorizing
Format: Kindle
While the analysis and argumentation presented in The Bible among the Myths is outstanding, the early chapters of the book suffer from a few problems. First - and this is mainly a complaint given my own preferences - the style of writing in chapters 1-4 differs noticeably from that of the rest of the book. While the introduction and chapters 5-10 reflect a learned, academic style, the first four chapters are written more casually, without quite the same rigor that characterizes most of Oswalt's writing. I am not entirely sure of the reason for this difference, and I wouldn't mention it if it were not for the second issue. These same chapters reflect their writing style in their content, so much so that I nearly gave up on the book after the first three chapters. While I appreciate the author's need to provide background information, definitions, and an overarching theoretical framework, his methodology as laid out in the text is much less rigorous than I would prefer to see. The first few chapters are much less heavily annotated, with fewer scholarly references and a great number of offhanded summaries. He labels his approach to the definition of "myth" as phenomenological, that is, examining the common characteristics of a variety of myths in order to summarize what is essential about them. However, his listings of these common characteristics are vague and poorly related to actual bodies of mythology that survive to the present day. Examples, when cited, are drawn almost exclusively from the Greek and Egyptian traditions. For the understanding of Israelite culture as it relates to its neighbors, this is certainly a fair beginning; for the definition of myth, which is a worldwide phenomenon transcending culture and geography, it seems very far from adequate. As someone who has a thorough knowledge of Christianity and Greco-Roman mythology and at least a nodding acquaintance with Egyptian, Norse/Germanic, and Celtic mythologies, I can at least begin to fill in some of the gaps in Oswalt's analysis. His generalizations, although sweeping, are not particularly problematic, but I am concerned that he embarks upon such a grand theoretical project without doing at least a little more specific analysis of various individual mythologies to demonstrate his points. More problematic in my opinion is that he groups all these various mythologies into a single worldview. Any number of scholars have tried to broaden the interpretations of myths to demonstrate that all cultures revert to the same basic narrative (The Golden Bough being the most famous example, and The Hero with a Thousand Faces being a more recent one); none of them has succeeded particularly well from a scholarly perspective. Despite this early weakness, Oswalt's work undergoes a dramatic improvement starting in chapter 5. His basic point - that the essential view of reality in Israel is demonstrably opposed to the view held by any of its neighbors - can be made without resorting to the sweeping claims of the earlier chapters, and he does an excellent job of presenting and analyzing the evidence for his view. His terminology (of "continuity" and "transcendence"), while not quite adequate to present an overarching definition and theory of what constitutes a myth, is certainly well-suited to his specific analysis. In particular, the analysis of the supposed parallels between the Enuma Elish and Genesis 1 is outstandingly done. After presenting a table with the usual outline of the Enuma Elish against the outline of Genesis 1, he simply proceeds to list the major plot events and how much time it takes to relate each one in the text itself. From this alone, it is readily apparent that the prevailing "outline" has intentionally been generated to encourage comparison to the Genesis account of creation. Such spurious efforts - minimizing the events of over 500 lines of poetry, while selecting 5 which bear questionable similarity to a verse in Genesis - are not honest scholarship, and kudos to Oswalt for pointing this out. I agree with a previous reviewer that it would have been helpful to append the text of the Enuma Elish in parallel with Genesis for readers to compare for themselves would have been a nice touch, but Oswalt's claims are not so elevated that they could not be disproven by direct appeal to the text. One final note. A previous reviewer noted that many of the authors Oswalt discusses wrote between the 60's and 80's, and complained that this made the book seem "dated." I am a graduate student in classics, and can assure those who are concerned that in any field dealing with antiquity, "dated" sources are often some of the most important. Unlike quantum physics, which has less than a century of history, the classic writings of antiquity and the history of those eras has been studied for over two millennia. Meaningful research begins, in fact, with the scholars of Alexandria who worked around 300 BCE; often the work they have done is not duplicated anywhere else. In the field of Ancient Near Eastern studies and Biblical studies in particular, there is likewise a long history of scholarly and interpretive effort. Sources less than a hundred years old are not dated - in the grand scheme of things, they are actually quite recent. It is also worth noting that many of the very recent books, which the reviewer presumably has in mind, are written for a popular audience and would not be considered truly scholarly efforts. Some are written by scholars, but those specific books are unlikely to come up in a serious academic analysis of the subject. The views entertained by those books, however, are very clearly addressed in The Bible among the Myths - largely because the scholarly arguments they were based on are much older than most people assume. Just because Oswalt does not mention names of popular authors does not mean that his argument fails to cover all its bases. All in all, the book is well written and persuasive. The earlier chapters might be found in any popular book on the subject, but the later chapters are more clearly of a scholarly bent, with corresponding vocabulary; readers who are looking for more of a lay approach to the issues may want to look for another author. However, the analysis of parallels between the Old Testament and the surviving Ancient Near Eastern literature is well-presented and balanced, and Oswalt's treatment of other scholars in the field seems to be fair. (I have not read any of their works myself, but Oswalt presents both strengths and weaknesses when considering whether an author's position is sufficiently explanatory and praises some aspects of works he disagrees with. He also is willing to point out when he agrees with some of the author's data, but draws a different conclusion. All of this strikes me as favorable.) The later chapters are thoroughly referenced in endnotes and draw from a variety of sources. Chapters 1-4: 3.5 stars Chapters 5-10: 5 stars Overall: 4.5 stars
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 2, 2014
K
Verified Purchase
KC
Charlottesville, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent resource for defending why Christianity is not rooted in mythology
Format: Paperback
I bought this book as required reading for an introductory Old Testament class I was taking in seminary. Sad to say, the textbook mostly collects dust. To this day, I use Oswalt's book for reference and continue to recommend the reading of it to others. I do not believe one can fully defend the Christian faith without first knowing how firmly convinced some scholars and historians are that Christianity is rooted in mythology. I will not lie. If you read about some of these myths in a silo, you may find yourself leaning toward such false beliefs. When you take a step back and consider the time in history in which the Old Testament was written, the picture becomes more clear. In the introduction to the Old Testament class, we also read Ancient Near Eastern Thought and the Old Testament by John H. Walton. Again, the text book is mostly collecting dust, I also repeatedly use this one as a reference. I would strongly recommend reading both books. The second is more academic in style than the first, but it helps lend further context.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 29, 2015
P
Verified Purchase
P. Hayes
Chelsea, US
★★★★★ 5
An inspiring take on the story of the Bible and reality.
Format: Kindle
This was an absolute pleasure to read. Oswalt utilizes his knowledge of ancient near east culture and religion to thorough debunk any effort to one might make to pretend that the Bible is of a similar mythology.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 7, 2025

recommand products