SKU: 83771088803
meticore herbicide

meticore herbicide Macspred Metmac 600 WG Metsulfuron methyl

Sale price$21.72 Regular price$24.13
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $6.03 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 9 - Aug 14

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

meticore herbicide Macspred Metmac 600 WG Metsulfuron methylGroup 2 Herbicide The Macspred Metmac 600WG Herbicide is a Group 2 Herbicide with 600 g kg Metsulfuron Methyl as its active ingredient. It is used for controlling brush and broadleaf weeds in native pastures, rights of way, commercial and industrial areas, as well as in winter cereal crops, grass pastures, and pasture renovation. Key Features: Broad spectrum Use Metmac alone or in a mixture controls a broad spectrum of different species of brush,

Group 2 Herbicide

The Macspred Metmac 600WG Herbicide is a Group 2 Herbicide with 600 g/kg Metsulfuron Methyl as its active ingredient. It is used for controlling brush and broadleaf weeds in native pastures, rights of way, commercial and industrial areas, as well as in winter cereal crops, grass pastures, and pasture renovation.

 

Key Features:

  • Broad spectrum - Use Metmac alone or in a mixture controls a broad spectrum of different species of brush, broadleaf and bulbous weeds. Mixed infestations of hard to control woody weeds, including Lantana, Gorse, Bracken, Tree-of-Heaven, St John’s Wort and Blackberry, Metmac can be sprayed in one pass. Metmac also controls nuisance pasture weeds, including Doublegee, Erodium, Sorrel, Onion grass and Paterson’s Curse (refer to label).

  • Dry flowable product (1kg packs) - Metmac is easy to transport, store, handle, measure and mix.

  • Low application rate - Metmac is highly active, meaning less chemical is used per hectare.

  • Non hormonal, non volatile - Metmac can be safely applied near horticultural crops providing adequate measures are taken to avoid physical spray drift.

  • Unscheduled poison - Metmac has a relatively low toxicity and is classed as an unscheduled poison. When used as directed, it does not create any hazards to humans, fish or animals.

  • No withholding period for grazing - the half-life of residues on foliage treated with Metmac is less than one day; after 3 days, essentially no residues can be detected. Livestock DO NOT have to be removed from the paddock during spraying or immediately afterwards. Metmac does not accumulate in animals or the environment: it is readily metabolized in and eliminated from animals via natural processes.

  • Biodegradable - Metmac degrades rapidly in the environment. Metmac degrades readily in the soil and is not considered a persistent herbicide. Metmac exhibits a half life of about 4 weeks when it is used at normal rates.

  • Compatible with other selective and knockdown herbicides and insecticides - Metmac is compatible with the non-selective herbicide, glyphosate, and the pasture herbicides, 2,4-D amine, MCPA amine, clopyralid and dicamba for even broader spectrum control when cleaning pastures. Metmac is also compatible with the commonly used pasture insecticides chlorpyrifos and omethoate.

  • Safe to the environment  - Metmac is very low in toxicity to mammals, birds, fish and insects.

 

Weeds Controlled:

Broadleaf and Herbaceous Weeds

  • African Turnip Weed (Sisymbrium thellungii)

  • Amsinckia / Yellow Burweed (Amsinckia spp.)

  • Ball Mustard (Neslia paniculata)

  • Boggabri Weed / Dwarf Amaranth (Amaranthus macrocarpus)

  • Calomba Daisy (Pentzia suffruticosa)

  • Cape Tulip (Homeria spp.)

  • Charlock (Sinapis arvensis)

  • Chickweed (Stellaria media)

  • Chicory (Cichorium intybus)

  • Clovers (Trifolium spp.)

  • Common Sowthistle (Sonchus oleraceus)

  • Cutleaf Mignonette (Reseda lutea)

  • Deadnettle (Lamium amplexicaule)

  • Denseflower Fumitory (Fumaria densiflora)

  • Dock (Broadleaf) (Rumex obtusifolius)

  • Faba Beans (Volunteer) (Vicia faba)

  • Field Peas (Volunteer) (Pisum sativum)

  • Hare’s Ear / Treacle Mustard (Conringia orientalis)

  • Hogweed / Wireweed (Polygonum aviculare)

  • Indian Hedge Mustard (Sisymbrium orientale)

  • Lincoln Weed (Diplotaxis tenuifolia)

  • Lupins (Volunteer) (Lupinus albus)

  • Mallee Catchfly (Silene apetala)

  • Medic (Volunteer Annual Medics) (Medicago spp.)

  • New Zealand Spinach (Tetragonia tetragonoides)

  • Parthenium Weed (Parthenium hysterophorus)

  • Paterson’s Curse / Salvation Jane (Echium plantagineum)

  • Prickly Lettuce (Lactuca serriola)

  • Red Pigweed (Portulaca oleracea)

  • Rough Poppy (Papaver hybridium)

  • Saltbush (Atriplex muelleri)

  • Shepherd’s Purse (Capsella bursa-pastoris)

  • Skeleton Weed (Suppression only) (Chondrilla juncea)

  • Slender Celery (Apium leptophyllum)

  • Smallflower Fumitory (Fumaria parviflora)

  • Sorrel (Rumex acetosella)

  • Soursob (Oxalis pes-caprae)

  • Spiny Emex / Doublegee / Threecornered Jack (Emex australis)

  • Stagger Weed (Stachys arvensis)

  • Storksbill / Wild Geranium (Erodium spp.)

  • Turnip Weed (Rapistrum rugosum)

  • Volunteer Sunflower (Helianthus annuus)

  • Wild / Crow Garlic (Allium vineale)

  • Wild Turnip (Brassica tournefortii)

Woody and Tough Weeds

  • Alligator Weed (Alternanthera philoxeroides)

  • Apple Box (Angophora floribunda)

  • Australian Blackthorn (Bursaria spinosa)

  • Bellyache Bush (Jatropha gossypifolia)

  • Blackberry (Rubus spp.)

  • Bitou Bush / Boneseed (Chrysanthemoides monilifera)

  • Bridal Creeper (Asparagus asparagoides)

  • Common Bracken (Pteridium esculentum)

  • Crofton Weed (Ageratina adenophora)

  • Darling Pea (Swainsona spp.)

  • Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare)

  • Golden Dodder (Cuscuta australis)

  • Great Mullein (Verbascum thapsus)

  • Harrisia Cactus (Eriocereus spp.)

  • Hawthorn (Crataegus laevigata)

  • Inkweed (Phytolacca octandra)

  • Japanese Sunflower (Tithonia diversifolia)

  • Kangaroo Thorn (Acacia paradoxa)

  • Lantana (Lantana camara)

  • Messmate Stringybark (Eucalyptus obliqua)

  • Mistflower / Creeping Crofton (Eupatorium riparium)

  • Narrowleaf Peppermint (Eucalyptus radiata)

  • Noogoora Burr (Xanthium pungens)

  • Privet (Ligustrum spp.)

  • Ragwort (Senecio jacobaea)

  • Rubber Vine (Cryptostegia grandiflora)

  • Smartweed (Polygonum spp.)

  • Sweet Briar (Rosa rubiginosa)

  • Tree of Heaven (Ailanthus altissima)

  • Wait-a-While (Caesalpinia decapelata)

  • Yellow Box (Eucalyptus melliodora)

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 83771088803

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell meticore herbicide

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 17 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
A
Verified Purchase
Adam C. Driver
Los Angeles, US
★★★★★ 5
Must read
Format: Paperback
Impressive second book by Justin Driver.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 1, 2025
J
Verified Purchase
james p. whitters III
Bozeman, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent!
Format: Paperback
Excellent read!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 5, 2025
B
Big Pumpkin
Carnegie, US
★★★★★ 1
A Disconnected and Legally Shaky Defense of Racial Preferences
Format: Paperback
While this book raises some thought-provoking points, it ultimately reads like a product of self-righteous elites disconnected from reality and from the American public. 1. Ignores public opinion. The author never acknowledges that polls consistently show Americans oppose racial preferences in college admissions. Proposition 16—which would have allowed such preferences—was defeated by a wide margin in 2020 in California, one of the nation’s most liberal states. A Brookings poll found that virtually all racial groups, including Black respondents, supported the Supreme Court’s Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) decision. 2. Starts with a strange premise. The first chapter claims conservatives will “regret” the SFFA ruling because universities will continue racial preferences covertly. But that sidesteps the real question: why shouldn’t colleges comply with the ruling’s letter and spirit? 3. Offers dubious legal advice. In Chapter Three, the author—himself a law professor—floats risky ideas for “working around” the Supreme Court’s decision. Many of these suggestions rest on shaky legal ground, as anyone familiar with the Second Circuit’s CACAGNY v. Adams, 116 F.4th 161 (2d Cir. 2024), would recognize. 4. Ignores proportionality and real-world outcomes. The book argues for “diversity” preferences without asking how much preference is justified. In reality, Asian American applicants face steep penalties. e.g. Stanley Zhong was rejected by five University of California campuses’ Computer Science programs as an in-state applicant—shortly before Google hired him for a full-time, Ph.D.-level software engineering position. Meanwhile, UC San Diego’s own freshman math-placement data show a surge of students—mostly “underrepresented minorities” favored by UC—placed into remedial courses, some testing at a 4th-grade level. It is hard to see how admitting these students is helping them other than allowing some elites to make themselves feel good or get a promotion. If this book represents what passes for legal scholarship at Yale, the state of American legal education should worry us all.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 12, 2025
J
Jason Galbraith
Birmingham, US
★★★★★ 5
Adherence to the Rule of Law Must Not Become a Fair Weather Sport
Format: Paperback
The memorable quotation I have used for the title of this review comes from the second chapter (I think) of "The Fall of Affirmative Action." What is actually happening in the United States is that the law is being enforced rigorously against "enemy" institutions such as those of higher learning and not at all against those with power, money, or affinity for same. The author, an African-American Yale Law professor, devotes his first chapter to the ways in which conservatives might critique the SCOTUS precedent that ended affirmative action and his second to the ways in which liberals might critique it. His most invaluable contribution to the debate is that civil rights can be advocated from an anti-classification standpoint or an anti-subordination standpoint, with anti-subordinationists on both sides of the affirmative action debate. This forced me to take perhaps a harder look at my own beliefs than most books or articles about affirmative action. African-Americans are certainly subordinated in reality by being excluded from higher education but they are subordinated mostly in the minds of white Americans by the fact that a white applicant with the same scores, extracurriculars and admission essays might not get in. That at least is the conclusion I have come to. "Students for Fair Admissions," the organization that brought down affirmative action before SCOTUS, has now sued those few elite educational institutions that DIDN'T see sharp drops in their African-American enrollment. One strongly suspects that SFFA if not the "Justices" they persuaded will be happy only with a formal quota for African-Americans which is half or less their proportion in the population of the state where the institution is located.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 4, 2025
A
Amy Sullivan
Boise, US
★★★★★ 5
Provocative and fascinating read
Format: Paperback
Justin Driver's excellent book makes the case that conservatives may come to regret the Supreme Court's 2023 decision striking down affirmative action in college admissions. He argues that, rather than simply check a box to indicate their race, the decision will force non-white applicants to "perform their trauma" in application essays in ways that conservatives may find even more corrosive. And affluent non-white candidates--the people conservatives say should not be benefiting from affirmative action--will be the ones best-positioned to take advantage of the opportunity, since they are most equipped to exploit the loopholes and work-arounds that the Roberts decision created. A truly provocative read.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 1, 2025

recommand products