Pay in installments of $5.57 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 1 - Aug 6
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
sure guard herbicide NuFarm SureGuard EZ HerbicideResidual Control that Lasts Now in a Convenient Liquid Formula New from Nufarm, liquid SureGuard EZ provides an exceptional value that allows you to offer more and make more a perfect solution for your customers. SureGuard EZ delivers the same long lasting residual control of grass and broadleaf weeds that youve come to expect from SureGuard in a new convenient liquid formulation. Also, SureGuard EZ enhances the speed and spectrum of glyphosate when
Residual Control that Lasts – Now in a Convenient Liquid Formula |
|
| TOUGH CONTROL, QUICK |
|
| USE SUMMARY |
|
WOODY LANDSCAPE ORNAMENTALS AND BARE GROUND AREAS Application of SureGuard EZ in the vicinity of ornamental plants is limited to directed sprays around well established woody shrubs and conifer and deciduous trees listed in the product label. SureGuard EZ may also be applied to maintain bare ground in non-crop areas as listed in the product label. Do not apply this product within any enclosed structure in residential or commercial properties. Pre-emergence Weed Control: Mix 0.21 - 0.42 fluid ounces of this product per gallon of spray solution and apply 1 gallon of spray solution to 500 - 1,000 square feet prior to weed germination. Apply to weed-free soil, mulch, or gravel surfaces. Moisture is necessary to activate this product on soil for residual weed control. Post-emergence Weed Control: Mix 0.21 - 0.42 fluid ounces of this product per gallon and apply 1 gallon of spray solution to 500 - 1,000 square feet to actively growing weeds. Tank mixing this product with glyphosate will increase the spectrum of post-emergent weed control and provide faster post-emergent weed control than glyphosate alone. Established landscape ornamentals have shown tolerance to applications of this product only when applied to the soil at the base of the plant and sprays do not directly contact or drift onto desirable plants. For maximum plant safety when using around desirable ornamentals, direct applications of this product (or this product plus glyphosate) toward the soil and leave a sufficient non-treated buffer to ensure spray solution does not contact desired plants. DORMANT BERMUDAGRASS (Only for use in certain states, see product label) SureGuard EZ may be applied as a single or split application to well established dormant Bermudagrass. It will provide pre-emergence and early post-emergence control of annual bluegrass, chickweed, henbit and other winter annual weeds listed in the product label and pre-emergence control of crabgrass, goose grass and other summer annual weeds listed in the product label. Application of this product to actively growing turfgrass or during green-up may cause unacceptable injury. Broadcast Application: Apply 8 - 12 fluid ounces of this product per broadcast acre as a pre-emergence application. If weeds are present at the time of application apply this product plus an adjuvant (0.25% v/v non-ionic surfactant). Make post-emergence applications when weeds are actively growing and no larger than 2” in height. Thorough spray coverage is necessary to maximize the post-emergence activity. When applied after weed germination, this product will provide pre-emergence and post-emergence control of broadleaf weeds and grasses listed in the product label. Post-emergence weed control may be more effective on certain weed species, and may not control mature, stressed or hardened off weeds that are not actively growing at the time of application. Spot Treatment: Mix 0.42 fluid ounces per gallon of this product and 2 teaspoons (1/3 fluid ounces) of non-ionic surfactant in 1 gallon of water and apply 1 gallon of spray solution per 1,000 square feet. Occasionally shake the spray solution while spraying to ensure the spray solution remains well mixed. Spray the target weeds until the leaves are wet. See label for complete use directions. |
| RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS |
| DO NOT apply to golf course putting greens. DO NOT apply to warm-season turfgrass that has been over seeded with cool-season turfgrass. DO NOT irrigate within 1 hour before/after application or apply if rain is expected within 1 hour. DO NOT apply more than 2 applications at 12 fl. oz./Acre or 3 applications at 8 fl. oz./year. DO NOT apply in fall before turfgrass has ceased active growth or in late winter/early spring after turfgrass has resumed active growth. DO NOT re-apply this product within 30 days. Allow 8 weeks between application and seeding or sodding of turfgrass. |
STATES NOT REGISTERED
AK
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 14 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
A Case for Jesus' Divine Self-Conception
Format: Kindle
This is a very meticulously reasoned argument attempting to show that Jesus had a Divine self-conception. That is, Jesus believed, and claimed, that he was God.
Pitre begins by posing C.S. Lewis’ famous “trilemma” to the reader. If Jesus claimed to be God, we have three ways to respond – he was either a Liar, Lunatic, or Lord. Pitre’s work in this book strives to bring us back, face to face, with this trilemma. To accomplish this, Pitre needs to defeat another popular notion in the modern mind – that Jesus, or at least much of the Gospel material about him, was a “Legend.” If Pitre can show that Jesus did, in fact, historically claim Divinity, we will be forced to respond to his claim and answer Jesus’ own question for ourselves – “Who do you say that I am?”
To accomplish this Pitre first attempts to show that the Gospels are historically reliable. He believes that, contrary to modern scholarly opinion, the Gospels were indeed written by the authors they have been attributed to (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John), that they were intended to portray historically accurate biographical pictures of Jesus, and that they were written much more closely to the time of Jesus than liberal scholars assume (Pitre tentatively dates the synoptic Gospels all before the destruction of the Temple in AD 70). These three pieces of evidence – authorship, intent, and dating – all lead Pitre to the conclusion that the Gospels give us historically accurate information about Jesus.
After setting the stage by arguing for the accuracy of our sources, Pitre delves into the synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) and tries to show that although it is not always explicit (i.e. Jesus doesn’t say “I am God, worship Me.”) even the synoptics portray Jesus as claiming Divinity. Using evidence such as Jesus’ use of the titles “Son of Man” and “I Am,” prophesy from the book of Daniel, Jesus’ “stilling of the storm,” the transfiguration, the pronouncement of the forgiveness of the parlytic’s sins, the riddle about the Son of David being David’s “Lord,”, the crucifixion, and the resurrection, Pitre makes his case. In the end, he believes that not only do the Gospel authors portray Jesus as Divine, but that these claims came from Jesus himself.
Thus we are led, full circle, back to the trilemma. We can call Jesus Liar, Lunatic, or Lord, but not, according to Pitre, a Legend.
This was a really interesting read from a conservative scholar. His exegesis of many Gospel passages illuminate how the Hebrew Scriptures provide a much needed backdrop for understanding each story. The Gospels are much more nuanced than we might first think and oftentimes one saying or image may evoke whole passages or concepts from the Old Testament that would have been apparent to early Jewish readers. As Pitre argues, understanding the Jewish context of the synoptic authors helps in understanding their Christology.
In the end, I agree with Pitre that the Gospels are generally more historically accurate than “mainstream” scholars give them credit for. I think it’s plausible that the Gospel titles reveal their true authors and that they were written fairly early after Jesus’ death (before the fall of Jerusalem). I also agree that the Synoptics may implicitly ascribe Divinity to Jesus – although I don’t think that is an open and shut case. If there were more explicit cases in the synoptic Gospels where Jesus claimed Divinity, it would help his case. It still seems to me the only explicit sayings we have come from the Gospel of John, which even Pitre doesn’t seem to argue is historically reliable (at least he doesn’t focus on this in the book).
It’s probably outside the scope of this book, but I would have loved to see Pitre address the idea of Jesus as Apocalyptic Prophet. He interacts with several scholars who accept this notion (EP Sanders, Dale Allison, Bart Ehrman, John Meier) and it’s a viable option in the world of Historical Jesus scholarship. I think it’s a relevant topic in all discussions surrounding a Historical Jesus and can be a large factor in how one answers the question of Jesus’ identity.
This study is worth reading regardless of your theological persuasion, and Pitre’s arguments deserve serious consideration.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 3, 2016
★★★★★ 5
Relief for dry mouth without gum irritation
Big improvement for users with sensitive gums. These relieve dry mouth during the night almost as well as the regular tabs. Some complained about a residual gel left on the gums. 🙄Just wipe it off. It’s a small thing.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 4, 2026
★★★★★ 5
An easy fix for dry mouth
Excellent for dry mouth.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 6, 2026
★★★★★ 1
This version doesn’t work
I used these 2 nights in a row. I was hoping Oracoat found a solution to the problem people like me have with the regular Xylimelts: irritation of gums. As others have noted the “sensitive” version doesn’t melt and the goo that remains can be difficult to remove. I didn’t have too much trouble after the first night. However, the second day after use, it was so hard to get the remains out, I wound up with a very sore spot from digging it out. I will toss the rest.
It’s too bad this effort fizzled. I hope Oracoat will find a solution For sensitive mouths. In the b meantime, I will use the original for a few nights and then stop before repeating. The idea behind the original product is fantastic. Unfortunately this attempt to make it usable for people with sensitive mouths hasn’t worked. Please try again.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 25, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Helped with Dry Mouth
Followed the instructions on the box and everything turned out amazing! Absolutely love the results and relief I felt
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 21, 2026