SKU: 89693366374
succulent clothing

succulent clothing Succulent Cinch-Waist Tunic

Sale price$18.11 Regular price$20.12
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $5.03 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 28 - Aug 2

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

succulent clothing Succulent Cinch-Waist TunicDescription Details Sizes My great aunt Honey was the very definition of thrift. She raised nine children on one war pension and turned frugality into art form. She planted "hen and chicks" succulents along her sidewalk because they would endlessly reproduce until her whole flowerbed was filled with them, all from just a few initial purchases. You'll find many outfits from this one garment just like thrifty Aunt Honey might have. The blousy upper body

  • My great-aunt Honey was the very definition of thrift. She raised nine children on one war pension and turned frugality into art form. She planted "hen and chicks" succulents along her sidewalk because they would endlessly reproduce until her whole flowerbed was filled with them, all from just a few initial purchases. 

    You'll find many outfits from this one garment--just like thrifty Aunt Honey might have. The blousy upper body and Dolman sleeves boast a forgiving drape, while the drop tail hem begs for a pair of leggings and a sweet pair of boots. (This might be an outfit we choose on those days we'd secretly rather be wearing pajamas, and no one has to know a thing about it. Ssssh.)
  • Every shirt, dress, scarf, and skirt from Flytrap Clothing features our own original designs, and we screen print them by hand in our backyard workshop here in North Carolina. 

    FIBER CONTENT: 65% polyester, 35% viscose

    CARE: Please wash in cold water and tumble dry on medium, or line dry if you wish to avoid shrinkage. Do not iron the print.
  • BASIC SIZE CHART:
    Small / 32-34" bust / Sizes 2-4
    Medium / 34-36" bust / Sizes 6-8
    Large / 36-38" bust / Sizes 10-12
    X-Large / 40-42" bust / Sizes 14-16

    HOW TO DOUBLE CHECK YOUR SIZE:
    We get the sizing information above from our manufacturers and then double check it against feedback from our models and customers, but without having a fashion industry standard for what constitutes a "medium," we know that online shopping can be a bit of a guessing game. We want to get your order right the first time, so we came up with this time-tested, tried and true formula for the most accuracy in sizing: lay one of your favorite tees flat on a table, and measure the width across the chest, underneath the sleeves. Then you can compare that flat measurement with the following measurements and leave the guesswork behind!

    Because of the loose fit of this particular dress, we do think it's helpful to order a size slightly wider than your favorite shirt.

    Small / 18.5" flat measurement
    Medium / 19.5" flat measurement
    Large / 20" flat measurement
    X-Large / 20.5" flat measurement
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 89693366374

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell succulent clothing

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 10 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
S
Verified Purchase
S. Langley
Massapequa, US
★★★★★ 4
A
This is a great resource. I thought I created great presentations before. Reading this made me realize the mistakes I was making and have me a process for really improving my decks
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 29, 2014
J
Verified Purchase
Judith Priddy
Lexington, US
★★★★★ 5
So glad that I have bought these books from Amazon
Format: Paperback
Still working on getting through, I try and read more each day
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 5, 2025
A
Verified Purchase
Adam C. Driver
Birmingham, US
★★★★★ 5
Must read
Format: Paperback
Impressive second book by Justin Driver.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 1, 2025
J
Verified Purchase
james p. whitters III
Grantham, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent!
Format: Paperback
Excellent read!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 5, 2025
B
Big Pumpkin
Waukegan, US
★★★★★ 1
A Disconnected and Legally Shaky Defense of Racial Preferences
Format: Paperback
While this book raises some thought-provoking points, it ultimately reads like a product of self-righteous elites disconnected from reality and from the American public. 1. Ignores public opinion. The author never acknowledges that polls consistently show Americans oppose racial preferences in college admissions. Proposition 16—which would have allowed such preferences—was defeated by a wide margin in 2020 in California, one of the nation’s most liberal states. A Brookings poll found that virtually all racial groups, including Black respondents, supported the Supreme Court’s Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) decision. 2. Starts with a strange premise. The first chapter claims conservatives will “regret” the SFFA ruling because universities will continue racial preferences covertly. But that sidesteps the real question: why shouldn’t colleges comply with the ruling’s letter and spirit? 3. Offers dubious legal advice. In Chapter Three, the author—himself a law professor—floats risky ideas for “working around” the Supreme Court’s decision. Many of these suggestions rest on shaky legal ground, as anyone familiar with the Second Circuit’s CACAGNY v. Adams, 116 F.4th 161 (2d Cir. 2024), would recognize. 4. Ignores proportionality and real-world outcomes. The book argues for “diversity” preferences without asking how much preference is justified. In reality, Asian American applicants face steep penalties. e.g. Stanley Zhong was rejected by five University of California campuses’ Computer Science programs as an in-state applicant—shortly before Google hired him for a full-time, Ph.D.-level software engineering position. Meanwhile, UC San Diego’s own freshman math-placement data show a surge of students—mostly “underrepresented minorities” favored by UC—placed into remedial courses, some testing at a 4th-grade level. It is hard to see how admitting these students is helping them other than allowing some elites to make themselves feel good or get a promotion. If this book represents what passes for legal scholarship at Yale, the state of American legal education should worry us all.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 12, 2025

recommand products