SKU: 45082958821
navy blue dress uniform

navy blue dress uniform United Kingdom. The Royal Navy Reserve Blue Serge Dress Uniform of DSM – eMedals

Sale price$26.46 Regular price$29.40
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $7.35 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Oct 1 - Oct 6

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

navy blue dress uniform United Kingdom. The Royal Navy Reserve Blue Serge Dress Uniform of DSM – eMedalsThe blue serge dress uniform belonging to Distinguished Service Medal recipient Lieutenant Horace David Herbert Osborne of the Royal Navy Reserve serving onboard HMT Fyldea, consisting of: 1. The dress blouse, constructed of dark navy blue whipcord woven wool with a traditional turned down collar that transitions into short lapels terminating at breast height. The collar is flanked on both sides by stiff sewn on shoulder boards that are fastened to

The blue serge dress uniform belonging to Distinguished Service Medal recipient Lieutenant Horace David Herbert Osborne of the Royal Navy Reserve serving onboard HMT Fyldea, consisting of:


1. The dress blouse, constructed of dark navy blue whipcord woven wool with a traditional turned-down collar that transitions into short lapels terminating at breast-height. The collar is flanked on both sides by stiff sewn-on shoulder boards that are fastened to the uniform at the shoulder via two stitches, as well as via a small single fire-gilded bronze button featuring a crowned fouled anchor surrounded by a rope, measuring 17 mm in diameter. The shoulder boards are decorated with a single strip of gilded bullion wire tresse near the shoulders, along with an upper strip of tresse that is looped onto itself with a central hand-embroidered “R” denoting that this tunic belonged to a member of the Royal Navy Reserves. This blouse features dual pockets at breast height that are secured shut with a flap and a single matching fire gilded naval button. Above the left pocket is a medal ribbon bar consisting of a ribbon consisting of three equally wide stripes of dark blue, white, and dark blue, with a thin dark blue stripe down the centre of the white. It is fastened to the tunic via a horizontal pinback and appears original to the uniform. The tunic can be buttoned-up via a series of three larger fire-gilded vertically mounted Royal Navy buttons, measuring 24mm in diameter, mounted onto the right side, and meeting an equal number of reinforced buttonholes on the opposing side. At waist-height, mounted horizontally on the right side of the blouse, are a series of three black bakelite buttons, that meet a single reinforced buttonhole on the opposing side for flexible size adjustment. The sleeves are plain and undecorated, featuring a cuff that is secured shut via a single integrated hidden bakelite button. The interior is completely unlined, without pockets, featuring only a strip of fabric sewn to the interior of the collar to act as a loop for hanging, as well as a white fabric label at the base of the back portion, stamped with “Admiralty - Blue Serge Working Dress Blouse Officer’s - Size No. 7” with height, breast, and waist measurements, along with the maker mark “H. Lotery & Co. Limited 4044”. It measures approximately 42 cm across the shoulders (seam to seam), with a sleeve length of 58 cm, and an overall length of 63 cm. 


2. The dress trousers, constructed of matching dark navy blue whipcord woven wool with a 33 cm long vertical slit in the centre of the front, secured shut via a series of four vertically mounted black bakelite buttons mounted on the right side, along with a single black bakelite button mounted on the left side, all meeting a reinforced button-hole on the opposing side. This pair features a single large vertical slit pocket on each side towards the front, lined on the inside with off-white cotton-blended fabric that also forms the partial lining along the waist of these trousers. There is also one equally-lined horizontal-slit pocket on each side of the rear, each secured shut via a single black bakelite button - with the right-side button broken in half but still functioning as it should.


On the exterior along the waist are a total of five small bakelite buttons for the attachment of suspenders. There is a neat dual-sided fold in the pant legs, terminating at the bottom without cuffs. These trousers measure approximately 40 cm across the waist, with a pant length of 111 cm, and an inseam of 76 cm. This dress uniform is extremely well preserved with minimal wear visible, with the exception of a single moth bite directly below the first button on the trousers. The black bakelite button on the right side to the rear of these trousers is partially broken off, but this does not impede the function of the button itself. It is in overall near mint condition, without stains, rips, or tears of any kind. 


Footnote: This tunic is accompanied by a naval message stemming from HMT Fyldea originally found in one of the breast pockets. His Majesty Trowlers Fyldea was launched on February 15th, 1930 and officially completed late 1934 for civilian use. It was requisitioned for war service in 1936, adapted for use as a minesweeping trawler in the Royal Navy, and was again completed on January 30th, 1942. Before her service in the Royal Navy, HMT Fyldea (FY666) took part in the evacuation of allied troops from the Dunkirk area from May 26th to June 4th, 1940, codenamed Operation Dynamo. 


The message contained in the uniform describes the events that transpired on August 24th, 1942 in great detail, including the sinking of HMS ML103 in the Dover Straits due to sailing into a minefield. HMT Fyldea responded and aided in the rescue of the survivors. Horace David Herbert Osborne (Lieutenant - JX. 24I602) was the only recipient of the Distinguished Service Medal serving on board HMT Fyldea during that time. He was born on June 30th, 1915 to parents William John Osborne and Mother Frances Annie Tunnidge. He married his wife Ethel Kathleen Johnson in 1940 at the age of 25. He is listed in the London Gazette on September 14th, 1943 as the recipient of The Distinguished Service Medal for skill and daring in successful minesweeping operations. He died on September 6th, 1986 in Essex, England. Following the Second World War, HMT Fyldea was sold to The Ocean Steam Trawling Co. Ltd and renamed H160. Ownership changed multiple times and she was sold for demolition on February 8th, 1958.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 45082958821

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell navy blue dress uniform

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 13 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
A
Verified Purchase
arcy
Belleville, US
★★★★★ 5
Love it
Color: Brushed Nickel, Material Type: Stainless Steel
Great quality works really well
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 16, 2026
C
Verified Purchase
C. Witt
Louisville, US
★★★★★ 4
Heavy Duty Paper Towel Holder
Color: Brushed Nickel, Material Type: Stainless Steel, Color: Brushed Nickel, Material Type: Stainless Steel
Nice looking, heavy duty paper towel holder. Looks like it'll be durable. The top did have a couple of dark, tarnished looking spots but it's not too noticeable.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 2, 2023
H
Verified Purchase
Hunter Hart
Boise, US
★★★★★ 5
Free Mini-Screwdriver + microfiber cloth? Thank you
Color: Gold, Material Type: Stainless Steel
100% worth the purchase mainly for the little screwdriver (a real one, just small) and microfiber cloth included. As long as you install it correctly it all holds together very well.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 18, 2026
C
Verified Purchase
Connie
Chelsea, US
★★★★★ 5
Love it
Color: Brushed Nickel, Material Type: Stainless Steel
I love it. It holds the jumbo rolls and that makes it a perfect kitchennitem
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 28, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Mr. Douglas
Belleville, US
★★★★★ 5
The Best Book on the Creation-Evolution Debate
Format: Paperback
“The book The Evolution of Adam is an accessible study of the hermeneutical issues involved in reading Genesis and Paul on Adam in view of evolution.” - Peter Enns In my opinion The Evolution of Adam by Peter Enns is the best book available on the evolution versus creation debate because it goes right to the heart of the matter. Christians grossly misunderstand the creation stories in Genesis because they read them from a modern point of view. The first part of the book deals with Adam in Genesis. The second part of the book deals with Paul's Adam in Romans. The book is short and very well written for the popular audience. PART 1 ADAM IN GENESIS Many stories in the Old Testament have parallels with other Ancient Near Eastern stories. The Adam story is no different as it has strong similarities to Atrahasis. If I may quote Enns, “Israel's creation story was written to say something about their place in the world and the God they worshiped. To think that the Israelites, alone among all other ancient peoples, were interested in (or capable of) giving some definitive, quasi-scientific, account of human origins is an absurd logic. And to read the story of Adam and Eve as if it were set up to so such a thing is simply wrongheaded. It strains credulity to think that, of all the ancient peoples with origins stories, Israel alone escaped this story-telling mentality and gave us something approximating 'history' or 'science' in the modern sense.” The Evolution of Adam shows conclusively that, “the Adam story in Genesis is part of Israel’s literature of national and religious self-definition, not the origin of humanity.” The Adam story is not concerned with human origins as most Christians assume. Adam is Israel. Israel’s history as a nation can be broken down as follows:   1. Israel is “created” by God at the exodus through a cosmic battle (gods are defeated and the Red Sea is “divided”);   2. The Israelites are given Canaan to inhabit, a lush land flowing with milk and honey;   3. They remain in the land as long as they obey the Mosaic law;   4. They persist in a pattern of disobedience and are exiled to Babylon. Israel’s history parallels Adam’s drama in Genesis:   1. Adam is created in Genesis 2 after the taming of chaos in Genesis 1;   2. Adam is placed in a lush garden;   3. Law (not to eat of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil) is given as a stipulation for remaining in the garden;   4. Adam and Eve disobey and are exiled. PART 2 PAUL'S ADAM Paul’s use of the Adam story, like Paul’s other uses of the Old Testament, is marked by creativity and the prior conviction that Jesus is God’s unexpected solution to a universal plight. Enns' summary of Paul's Adam in Romans 5:12-21 is as follows: 1. Adam is hardly mentioned in the Old Testament. 2. Some see Noah, Abraham, Moses, and David as “new Adams.” Paul represents Jesus as a new Adam. 3. The Fall of man is not taught in the Old Testament. 4. The Fall of man is not taught in the Garden scene. The imputation of Adam’s sin is not taught in the garden story. 5. The Adam/Jesus Parallel in Romans 5 is both clear and not so clear. What does Paul mean when he says that through Adam’s sin, “death came to all, because all sinned.” One might have expected Paul to say, “because Adam sinned” (death is Adam’s fault). 6. Paul’s Jesus/Adam parallel does not stem from a “plain reading” of Genesis. It is selective and theologically driven. The Book of Romans is not about personal salvation, but about the Jew/Gentile relationship. 7. Paul was an ancient man and he had an ancient view of human origins. 8. Paul used the Old Testament in creative ways that violate the grammatical-historical-contextual approach. So he could be doing the same with Adam. 9. Adam was used creatively in Second Temple Jewish literature (Paul’s contemporaries). CONCLUSION Evolution and creation are not in conflict because the early chapters of Genesis have nothing to do with HOW God created the world or the first humans. Therefore science can be studied freely for what it is and the Old Testament can be understood as ancient Israel's story. If I may quote Enns again, “The root of the conflict over evolution and creation for many Christians is not scientific or even theological, but group identity and fear of losing what it offers. The challenge of evolution is here to stay, and its effect on how Christians read Genesis and Paul must be addressed deliberately.” “Evangelicals tend to focus on how to protect the Bible against the attacks of evolution. The real challenge before them is to reorient their expectation of what the story of Adam and Eve is actually prepared to deliver.” If you are looking to solve the evolution-creation debate in your mind then the Evolution of Adam is the book to read. Evolution and creation are both true. God created through evolution. The Bible is not a modern science book.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 15, 2012

recommand products