Pay in installments of $6.52 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Oct 3 - Oct 8
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
white flower spider plant Hymenocallis speciosa – Green-Tinged Spider Lily BulbHymenocallis speciosa Caribbean spiderlily with fragrant white flowers Hymenocallis speciosa (L. f. ex Salisb.) Salisb., known as the Green tinge Spiderlily, is a striking perennial bulb native to the Caribbean. It forms lush clumps of long, strap shaped leaves and produces spectacular umbels of large, white, spider like flowers. Each bloom carries a subtle green tinge at the base and exudes a sweet vanilla fragrance. A single flowering stalk can hold
Hymenocallis speciosa – Caribbean spiderlily with fragrant white flowers
Hymenocallis speciosa (L.f. ex Salisb.) Salisb., known as the Green-tinge Spiderlily, is a striking perennial bulb native to the Caribbean. It forms lush clumps of long, strap-shaped leaves and produces spectacular umbels of large, white, spider-like flowers. Each bloom carries a subtle green tinge at the base and exudes a sweet vanilla fragrance. A single flowering stalk can hold up to 20 blossoms at once, making this species both an elegant garden focal point and a rewarding pot plant for collectors of ornamental bulbs.
Key features of Hymenocallis speciosa
- Growth form: Bulbous perennial with evergreen strap-shaped foliage in warm climates.
- Flowers: Showy, spider-like white blooms with a delicate vanilla scent.
- Blooming season: Summer to early autumn, depending on growing conditions.
- Inflorescence: Each stalk carries up to 20 flowers, opening successively.
- Ornamental value: Dramatic floral display combined with fragrance and tropical foliage.
Natural habitat and distribution
Hymenocallis speciosa is native to the Caribbean islands, where it grows in coastal areas, open woodlands, and gardens near settlements. It thrives in warm, humid climates with well-draining soils and seasonal rainfall. Its adaptability to cultivation has made it popular far beyond its natural range, often planted in tropical and subtropical gardens around the world.
How to grow Hymenocallis speciosa
- Light: Prefers full sun to partial shade; brighter light enhances blooming.
- Temperature: Best grown between 18 – 30 °C; bulbs are frost-sensitive and should be protected below 10 °C.
- Watering: Keep evenly moist during active growth; reduce watering when dormant.
- Soil: Fertile, free-draining mix with organic matter and sand or grit for aeration.
- Fertilization: Apply balanced fertilizer every 2 – 3 weeks during the growing season.
- Propagation: By offsets (bulb division) or seeds, though seedlings take several years to flower.
Common challenges
- Poor flowering: Usually linked to insufficient sunlight or cramped bulbs that need dividing.
- Overwatering: Standing water or poorly draining soil can cause bulb rot.
- Pests: May occasionally attract spider mites or mealybugs in indoor conditions.
Additional notes
Hymenocallis speciosa belongs to the Amaryllidaceae family, sharing lineage with familiar ornamentals such as Amaryllis and Crinum. Its elegant flowers and fragrance make it a highly desirable bulb for collectors of tropical ornamentals. In larger landscapes, it is often mass-planted for dramatic floral displays, while in pots it remains manageable and rewarding for small-space gardeners.
Etymology
The genus name Hymenocallis comes from the Greek words hymen (“membrane”) and kallos (“beauty”), referencing the delicate, membranous corona of the flowers. The species epithet speciosa means “showy” or “splendid” in Latin, a fitting description for this ornamental plant.
Bring Hymenocallis speciosa into your collection
If you’re looking for a tropical bulb that combines dramatic blooms, fragrance, and lush foliage, Hymenocallis speciosa is an excellent choice. Order today and enjoy the elegance of the Caribbean spiderlily in your home or garden.
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 20 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Purse companion
Size: 27 Count (Pack of 1)
I carry these lozenges in my purse. It tastes good, and truly helps with dry mouth!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 22, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Great lozenge! Tastes very good.
Size: 27 Count (Pack of 1)
Very effective and tastes good. I will continue using it after my chemo treatment is finished.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 1, 2026
★★★★★ 3
Dry mouth is miserable.
Size: 27 Count (Pack of 1)
The mouth lozenges for dry mouth were excellent at first, but I have dry mouth all day, and they started upsetting my stomach. I guess I was taking too many. Since I switched to the spry, I don't have a problem. I keep the a small bottle of the spray in my pocketbook, because I need it sporadically. It is probably different with each individual.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 11, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Well researched, solidly faithful; undoes the harm of decades of scholars' attempts to debunk the Gospels
Format: Hardcover
Lots of reviewers have written great reviews, so this one will be fairly brief. Brant Pitre's books, this one included, are an example of what is best in the new scriptural studies emerging today. His research is solid and meticulous - no sloppiness here! - and he writes with a refreshingly strong Catholic faith. This book carefully and effectively undoes the harm of decades of scholars' attempts to debunk the Gospels. He very effectively rebuts 20th century scholars' claims that we don't know who wrote the Gospels, and that they were written so long time after Jesus' time on earth that they lack credibility as eyewitness, historical accounts. Step by step, with each chapter building on the next, Pitre shows the opposite to be true. Christians who have been disturbed by the debunkers will be strengthened, confirmed, and given much joy by this book. I've just purchased three more copies to give to friends - one of them a Catholic high school teacher and two, Catholic priests. But I think Christians of any denomination will welcome this book.
Pitre's writing style is a joy to read: lucid, clear, and very easy to understand (even when I'm tired at the end of the day), without being annoyingly clever (as some popularizers can be) or pushy (as some apologists are). (I see Pitre as neither a popularizer nor an apologist; he is a scripture scholar who also is a fantastic communicator.) Without any attempt on his part to be "entertaining," Pitre has written a cliff-hanger - I couldn't put the book down! His insights - and now I'm speaking of the insights in all three of his books that I've read so far - Jesus and the Jewish Roots of the Eucharist, Jesus the Bridegroom, and this book, The Case for Jesus - are profound and deeply enriching spiritually. Although I've questioned a few of his insights, most of them have moved me profoundly, with a sense of wonder, and deep love and gratitude to Our Lord. Reading his books is, for me, a real form of prayer. I am looking forward to reading Jesus and the Last Supper (borrowed from the library to see whether I'll want to buy my own copy); this last book, per its reviewers, is aimed at a scholarly audience and different in tone from the three very accessible books I named above, but I'm expecting this book to be a treasure, too.
In all of his books, Brant Pitre's lucid writing style, coupled with his solid scholarship, deep faith, and beautiful love for Our Lord, makes for a very special reading experience. I appreciate his respect for and great knowledge of Judaism, and the way he helps us to see the rich continuity between the Jewish and Christian faiths. Brant Pitre’s books are a real gift to us all.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 27, 2017
★★★★★ 5
Who is Jesus: A Case for Jesus’ Divinity
Format: Hardcover
I thoroughly enjoyed reading Brant Pitre’s “The Case for Jesus.” The New Testament scholar’s contribution to Catholic popular literature on the identity of Jesus stands well above much of the plethora of material available to Christian readers today. Pitre (mostly) convincingly builds his case through careful, fact-based argumentation--even if one could draw different conclusions from the same evidence.
What case is Pitre trying to make? In effect, he makes several cases leading up to his central point of who Jesus was and is.
In the first part of this slim volume, he treats the authorship of the Gospels. In this matter, as in most of the book, his principle foil seems to be Bart Ehrman, a former Fundamentalist Christian-turned-apostate scholar whose popular works attempt to undermine the validity of the Gospels as meaningful historical documents and specifically the claim that Jesus is the Son of God. Contrary to Ehrman, Pitre argues for the traditional authorship of the Gospels. As two significant pieces of evidence, Pitre points out that even the earliest Gospel manuscripts and secondary references to the Gospels include the writers’ names by which we know them. The Gospels, then, were never really “anonymous.” This leads Pitre to challenge the scholarly consensus on the dating of the Gospels, and the more controversial hypothesis that Matthew and Luke were based in part on a hypothetical, now lost (and, as Pitre points out, never referenced) book of Jesus sayings denoted by scholars as the “Q” source.
As for the so-called lost or apocryphal gospels, Pitre shows that they were never really lost, that most of them were known by early Christian writers, who regarded them as forgeries. In the case of the apocryphal gospels, then, even though the internal evidence suggests that they were written by the apostles to whom they were ascribed, the attributions were never accepted. Ehrman has argued that the apocryphal gospels were not accepted by mainstream or orthodox Christianity, but were embraced by the communities, such as the Gnostics, for whom they were written. In a way, Pitre and Ehrman aren’t in contradiction here, but they just interpret the data differently. In other words, if you accept that the Church Fathers are espousing the correct version of Christianity, then Pitre’s point stands; if you hold on to the view that the Church Fathers represented one view of Christianity among many, all to be regarded equally, then the criticism of the (orthodox) Church Fathers matters less.
Pitre, while not dismissing the validity of literary criticism, argues for the historical value of the Gospels. He wants to treat the Gospels as biographies of Jesus. Their inconsistencies and apparent contradictions stem not, as Ehrman would have it, from a “telephone game”-like process of accretions and alterations over time, or even so much from the requirements of the communities for which they were written, as from the different perspectives and life experiences of their writers. Pitre notes the similarities between the Gospels and ancient Greco-Roman biographies in countering the ideas of Ehrman and before him, Rudolf Bultmann, in thinking of the Gospels as akin to folktales, fairy stories, and myths. Pitre stands for the literal truth of the Gospels as far as they will allow in part because two of the four Gospels tell us that they are true (Lk 1:1-4; Jn 19:35, 21:24-25). There’s a bit of circularity in that argument.
The main case for Jesus that Pitre wants to make is for His divinity. The Gospels, as Luke Timothy Johnson and other scholars have explained, try to answer, however obliquely, the question Jesus himself poses to Peter: “But who do you say that I am?” (Mk 8:29). Pitre makes the case that the Gospels--even the synoptic Gospels--speak to Jesus’ being God. Pitre makes a lively, even entertaining, argument, using some passages, e.g., the reference to the sign of Jonah, in ways I certainly hadn’t thought of before. Even though as a Catholic I accept Jesus’ divinity, I am willing to allow that others may look at Pitre’s argument and reasonably come to different conclusions. One train of thinking might be this: Pitre notes that Jesus speaks in parables and riddles, and so His claims to divinity are indirect. Moreover, an outright and indeed blasphemous claim to His divinity might have put an even earlier end to Jesus’ three years of ministry. But the Gospel writers should not have been constrained by either Jesus’ particular application of rhetoric or his need to be circumspect; why did the Gospel writers not forthrightly declare that Jesus was God? I think the proper response to this is that Matthew, Mark, Luke and John wanted the person encountering the Gospels to answer for themselves who Jesus was and is. In other words, by transmitting the way Jesus conveyed who He was to His disciples perhaps they, too, would draw in and win over later followers of Christ. It’s much more efficacious to engage the potential convert that way than simply to assert that Jesus is God.
Brad Pitre has written a wonderful and engaging book. Even if you don’t agree with all of his conclusions, you will appreciate his logical and engaging discussion. This book is meant for the general reader, although it does have a scholarly apparatus by way of careful notes. An index would have been nice but this is a short book of a couple hundred pages. If you’re on a long flight, this book would be the perfect company.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 28, 2016
recommand products
Nearly Natural Geranium Hanging Basket Silk Plant
24.42
Gardener's Supply Company
22.28
Ashman Metal Hanging Planter Basket with Coco Coir Liner Round Wire Plant Holder Chain Porch Décor Flower Pots Hanger (200 Count)
26.49
Garden Stake
25.01
Lakeside Talavera-Inspired Garden Stakes-Butterfly or Hummingbird
26.17